Clashes Among Founding Partners: How Entrepreneurs Overcome Conflicts?
DOI:
10.14211/regepe.v9i4.1895Keywords:
Founding partners, Operational conflict, Affective conflict, Startups, AcceleratorAbstract
Objective: Conflicts have negative impacts on organizational performance and can lead to company mortality. The GVentures Accelerator, from the School of Business Administration of São Paulo (EAESP-FGV) identified that several startups that failed during and after the acceleration process had conflicts among the founding partners. This work aims to understand why some entrepreneurial teams in a pre-seed stage are able to overcome conflicts while others are not
Methodology: We conducted a case study of 9 accelerated startups using in-depth interviews with 20 founding partners, and the interviews were followed by the codification and analysis of the cases with support from the manager responsible for the accelerator.
Results: The research concludes that operational conflicts that escalate to affective conflicts due to disagreements in the process of giving and receiving feedback and/or mistrust between partners can lead to the dissolution of a company. On the other hand, founding members, even if they experience affective conflicts, are able to overcome the problems using the strategies of taking a step aside, giving in and putting their egos aside. It was also identified that the acceleration process tends to exacerbate the operational conflicts between founding partners.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: The research contributes to the literature about founding teams by pointing out that operational conflict does not necessarily lead to the dissolution of the organization or closing the business, but operational conflicts that intensify to affective conflicts due to disagreements in the process of giving and receiving feedback and/or distrust among partners can lead to the dissolution of the organization
Relevance/originality: Founding teams are the backbone of any company. In spite of several articles discussing team conflict little is known about why some entrepreneurial team are able to overcome conflicts while other not. Moreover, also little is known about the role accelerators play in these conflicts.
Social/management contribution: The conclusions about the strategies for managing founding team conflicts: taking a step aside, giving in and putting their egos aside; may be very useful for both entrepreneurs and accelerators’ management team in dealing with conflicts among founders.
Downloads
References
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11: 369–386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/248684
Birdsall, M., Jones, C., Lee, C., Somerset, C., & Takaki, S. (2013). Business accelerators: The evolution of rapidly growing industry. MBA Dissertation. University of Cambridge, United Kindgom.
Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The evolution of business incubators: comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation 32 (2): 110–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.003
Castro, D. R., Kluger, A. N., & Itzchakov, G. (2016). Does avoidance-attachment style attenuate the benefits of being listened to? European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(6): 762–775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2185
Christiansen, J. (2009). Copying Y Combinator, a framework for developing seed accelerator programmes. MBA Dissertation. University of Cambridge, United Kindgom.
Clark, R. E. (2005). Research-Tested Team Motivation Strategies. Performance Improvement, 44(1), 13–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140440107
Cohen, S. G., & Hochberg, Y. V. (2014). Accelerating Startups: The Seed Accelerator Phenomenon. SSRN Journal, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2418000
De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1191–1201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1191
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4): 741–749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
Dierdorff E. C., Bell S. T., & Belohlav J. A. (2011). The power of “we”: Effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 247–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020929
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., Gatewood, E., & Katz, J. A. (1994). Finding the Entrepreneur in Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18: 5–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800301
George, B., Eriksonb, T., & Parhankangasc, A. (2016). Preventing dysfunctional conflict: examining the relationship between different types of managerial conflict in venture capital-backed firms. Venture Capital, 18(4): 279–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2016.1224457
Hallen, B. L., Bingham, C. B., & Cohen, S. (2014). Do Accelerators Accelerate? A Study of Venture Accelerators as a Path to Success. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1: 12955–12955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.185
Itzchakov, G., DeMarree, K. G., Kluger, A. N., & Turjeman-Levi, Y. (2018). The Listener Sets the Tone: High-Quality Listening Increases Attitude Clarity and Behavior-Intention Consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(5): 762–778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217747874
Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
Jehn, K. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations: 87–100. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217016.n7
Jin, L., Madison, K., Kraiczy, N. D., Kellermanns, F. W., Crook, T. R., & Xi, J. (2017). Entrepreneurial Team Composition Characteristics and New Venture Performance: A Meta–Analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5): 743–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12232
Jung, H.; Vissa, B., & Pich, M. (2017). How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions? Academy of Management Journal, 60(1): 264–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0813
Katzenbach J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Khan, M. S., Breitenecker, R. J., Gustafsson, V., & Schwarz; E. J. (2015). Innovative Entrepreneurial Teams: The Give and Take of Trust and Conflict. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4): 558–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12152
Kleingeld A.; Van Mierlo H.; Arends L. (2011). The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 1289–1304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024315
Klotz, A. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Bradley, B. H., & Busenitz, L. W. (2014). New venture teams a review of the literature and roadmap for future research. Journal of Management, 40(1): 226–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313493325
Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., Meves, Y., & Kensbock, J. M. (2017). When members of entrepreneurial teams differ: linking diversity in individual-level entrepreneurial orientation to team performance. Small Business Economics, 48: 843–859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9818-6
March, J.; Simon, H. (1981). Teoria das organizações, 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.
Miller, P., & Bound, K. (2011). The startup factories–the rise of accelerator programmes to support new technology ventures. London: Nesta.
Mishira, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: the centrality of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler, Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research: 261-287. Newbury Park, CA. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n13
Park, G., & Deshon, R. P. (2010). A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 824-833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019939
Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50-51(c): 13–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003
Pelled, L. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, (7): 615- 631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.6.615
Porter, T. W., & Lilly, B. S. 1996. The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4): 361-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022787
Radojevich-kelley, N., & Hoffman, D. L. (2012). Analysis of Accelerator Companies: An Exploratory Case Study of Their Programs, Processes, and Early Results. Small Business Institute Journal, 8(2): 54–70.
Rauch, A., & Rijsdijk, S.A., (2013). The Effects of General and Specific Human Capital on Long-Term Growth and Failure of Newly Founded Businesses. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. 37( 4): 923-941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00487.x
Revilla, E., & Rodríguez, B. (2011). Team Vision in Product Development: How Knowledge Strategy Matters. Technovation, 3: 118–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.007
Sapienza, H. J., & Gupta, A. K. 1994. Impact of Agency risks and Task Uncertainty on Venture Capitalists-CEO Interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 544–74.
Simons, T. L.; & Peterson, R. S. 2000. Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams: The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1): 102-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.1.102
Souitaris, V.; & Maestro, B. M. 2010. Polychronicity in top management teams: The impact on strategic decision processes and performance of new technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6): 652–678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.831
Steffens, P., Terjesen, S., & Davidsson, P. 2012. Birds of a feather get lost together: new venture team composition and performance. Small Business Economics. 39: 727–743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9358-z
Stewart, G. L. 2006. A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1): 29–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277792
Unger, M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. 2011. Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3): 341-358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.004
Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. 2007. Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1): 515–541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
Downloads
Published
Métricas
Visualizações do artigo: 542 PDF (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 328 PDF downloads: 158
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
-
The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in the journal;
-
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas, and concepts expressed in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of their authors;
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the CC BY 4.0
License, which allows sharing the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; -
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work (Submitted version, Accepted version [Manuscript accepted by the author], or Published version [Record version]) online, for example in institutional repositories or preprints, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. REGEPE requires that authors indicate/link the published article with DOI. See the Effect of Open Access.
