Clashes Among Founding Partners: How Entrepreneurs Overcome Conflicts?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v9i4.1895Keywords:
Founding partners, Operational conflict, Affective conflict, Startups, AcceleratorAbstract
Objective: Conflicts have negative impacts on organizational performance and can lead to company mortality. The GVentures Accelerator, from the School of Business Administration of São Paulo (EAESP-FGV) identified that several startups that failed during and after the acceleration process had conflicts among the founding partners. This work aims to understand why some entrepreneurial teams in a pre-seed stage are able to overcome conflicts while others are not
Methodology: We conducted a case study of 9 accelerated startups using in-depth interviews with 20 founding partners, and the interviews were followed by the codification and analysis of the cases with support from the manager responsible for the accelerator.
Results: The research concludes that operational conflicts that escalate to affective conflicts due to disagreements in the process of giving and receiving feedback and/or mistrust between partners can lead to the dissolution of a company. On the other hand, founding members, even if they experience affective conflicts, are able to overcome the problems using the strategies of taking a step aside, giving in and putting their egos aside. It was also identified that the acceleration process tends to exacerbate the operational conflicts between founding partners.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: The research contributes to the literature about founding teams by pointing out that operational conflict does not necessarily lead to the dissolution of the organization or closing the business, but operational conflicts that intensify to affective conflicts due to disagreements in the process of giving and receiving feedback and/or distrust among partners can lead to the dissolution of the organization
Relevance/originality: Founding teams are the backbone of any company. In spite of several articles discussing team conflict little is known about why some entrepreneurial team are able to overcome conflicts while other not. Moreover, also little is known about the role accelerators play in these conflicts.
Social/management contribution: The conclusions about the strategies for managing founding team conflicts: taking a step aside, giving in and putting their egos aside; may be very useful for both entrepreneurs and accelerators’ management team in dealing with conflicts among founders.
Downloads
References
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11: 369–386
Birdsall, M., Jones, C., Lee, C., Somerset, C., & Takaki, S. (2013). Business accelerators: The evolution of rapidly growing industry. MBA Dissertation. University of Cambridge, United Kindgom.
Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The evolution of business incubators: comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation 32 (2): 110–121.
Castro, D. R., Kluger, A. N., & Itzchakov, G. (2016). Does avoidance-attachment style attenuate the benefits of being listened to? European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(6): 762–775.
Christiansen, J. (2009). Copying Y Combinator, a framework for developing seed accelerator programmes. MBA Dissertation. University of Cambridge, United Kindgom.
Clark, R. E. (2005). Research-Tested Team Motivation Strategies. Performance Improvement, 44(1), 13–16.
Cohen, S. G., & Hochberg, Y. V. (2014). Accelerating Startups: The Seed Accelerator Phenomenon. SSRN Journal, 1-16.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1191–1201.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4): 741–749.
Dierdorff E. C., Bell S. T., & Belohlav J. A. (2011). The power of “we”: Effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 247–262.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.
Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.
Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., Gatewood, E., & Katz, J. A. (1994). Finding the Entrepreneur in Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18: 5–9.
George, B., Eriksonb, T., & Parhankangasc, A. (2016). Preventing dysfunctional conflict: examining the relationship between different types of managerial conflict in venture capital-backed firms. Venture Capital, 18(4): 279–296.
Hallen, B. L., Bingham, C. B., & Cohen, S. (2014). Do Accelerators Accelerate? A Study of Venture Accelerators as a Path to Success. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1: 12955–12955.
Itzchakov, G., DeMarree, K. G., Kluger, A. N., & Turjeman-Levi, Y. (2018). The Listener Sets the Tone: High-Quality Listening Increases Attitude Clarity and Behavior-Intention Consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(5): 762–778.
Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256–282.
Jehn, K. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations: 87–100. London: Sage.
Jin, L., Madison, K., Kraiczy, N. D., Kellermanns, F. W., Crook, T. R., & Xi, J. (2017). Entrepreneurial Team Composition Characteristics and New Venture Performance: A Meta–Analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5): 743–771.
Jung, H.; Vissa, B., & Pich, M. (2017). How do entrepreneurial founding teams allocate task positions? Academy of Management Journal, 60(1): 264–294.
Katzenbach J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Khan, M. S., Breitenecker, R. J., Gustafsson, V., & Schwarz; E. J. (2015). Innovative Entrepreneurial Teams: The Give and Take of Trust and Conflict. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4): 558–573.
Kleingeld A.; Van Mierlo H.; Arends L. (2011). The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 1289–1304.
Klotz, A. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Bradley, B. H., & Busenitz, L. W. (2014). New venture teams a review of the literature and roadmap for future research. Journal of Management, 40(1): 226–255.
Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., Meves, Y., & Kensbock, J. M. (2017). When members of entrepreneurial teams differ: linking diversity in individual-level entrepreneurial orientation to team performance. Small Business Economics, 48: 843–859.
March, J.; Simon, H. (1981). Teoria das organizações, 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.
Miller, P., & Bound, K. (2011). The startup factories–the rise of accelerator programmes to support new technology ventures. London: Nesta.
Mishira, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: the centrality of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler, Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research: 261-287. Newbury Park, CA. London: Sage.
Park, G., & Deshon, R. P. (2010). A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 824-833.
Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50-51(c): 13–24.
Pelled, L. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, (7): 615- 631.
Porter, T. W., & Lilly, B. S. 1996. The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4): 361-376.
Radojevich-kelley, N., & Hoffman, D. L. (2012). Analysis of Accelerator Companies: An Exploratory Case Study of Their Programs, Processes, and Early Results. Small Business Institute Journal, 8(2): 54–70.
Rauch, A., & Rijsdijk, S.A., (2013). The Effects of General and Specific Human Capital on Long-Term Growth and Failure of Newly Founded Businesses. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice. 37( 4): 923-941.
Revilla, E., & Rodríguez, B. (2011). Team Vision in Product Development: How Knowledge Strategy Matters. Technovation, 3: 118–27.
Sapienza, H. J., & Gupta, A. K. 1994. Impact of Agency risks and Task Uncertainty on Venture Capitalists-CEO Interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 544–74.
Simons, T. L.; & Peterson, R. S. 2000. Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams: The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1): 102-11.
Souitaris, V.; & Maestro, B. M. 2010. Polychronicity in top management teams: The impact on strategic decision processes and performance of new technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6): 652–678.
Steffens, P., Terjesen, S., & Davidsson, P. 2012. Birds of a feather get lost together: new venture team composition and performance. Small Business Economics. 39: 727–743.
Stewart, G. L. 2006. A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1): 29–55.
Unger, M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. 2011. Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3): 341-358.
Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. 2007. Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1): 515–541
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a (Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work (Submitted version, Accepted version [Author Accepted Manuscript], or Published version [Version of Record]) online, e.g., in any repository, Any website or Author’s homepage , as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. The REGEPE ask as policy conditions for the Authors to: Must link to published article with DOI. See the Effect of Open Access at: http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
