What to do when the cage opens? Entrepreneurial motivations and individual beliefs of former convicts

Authors

  • Larissa Cavalcante Albuquerque larissa_cavalcante@gmail.com
    Faculty of Economics, Administration, Actuarial and Accounting (FEAAC), Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
  • Evangelina da Silva Sousa evangelinasousa@gmail.com
    Faculty of Economics, Administration, Actuarial and Accounting (FEAAC), Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8455-1824
  • Raimundo Eduardo Silveira Fontenele prof.eduardo.fontenele@gmail.com
    Faculty of Economics, Administration, Actuarial and Accounting (FEAAC), Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
  • Tereza Cristina Batista de Lima tcblima@uol.com.br
    Faculty of Economics, Administration, Actuarial and Accounting (FEAAC), Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6594-4921

DOI:

10.14211/regepe.e1938

Keywords:

Entrepreneurial Motivation, Salient Beliefs, Penitentiary.

Abstract

Purpose: to investigate the entrepreneurial motivations and individual beliefs of former convicts from prisons in Ceará regarding opening their own business, according to the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Method/Approach: a qualitative research was carried out with eleven former convicts from the Ceará prison system. The data collected through semi-structured interviews were analyzed by Atlas-ti software, using content analysis and pattern matching techniques. Results: the former convicts expressed their intention to open their own business based on three motivations: necessity, opportunity, and personal achievement. The entrepreneurial intention was influenced by behavioral and normative beliefs, and perceived control. Theoretical/Methodological contributions: this research promotes and expands the discussion on entrepreneurship after a period of deprivation of liberty, using the TPB to identify beliefs that precede the entrepreneurial intention. Relevance/Originality: the findings oppose the dichotomous classification of entrepreneurial motivation described by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. The study endorses the important influence of social reference in building normative beliefs, which were perceived as facilitators of behavioral intention, being often confused with beliefs of perceived control. Social contributions: to recognize the low employability of former convicts as a management problem, which can foster a debate on strategies that seek to minimize these negative impacts. This study invites a discuss on joint efforts between public authorities, the population and academia, to mitigate prejudice against former offenders by society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Larissa Cavalcante Albuquerque , Faculty of Economics, Administration, Actuarial and Accounting (FEAAC), Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

is Academic Coordinator at UNIFANOR. Master in Administration and Controllership from the Federal University of Ceará (UFC) and Graduated in Social Communication with specialization in Advertising and Propaganda from UFC. Her research interests are entrepreneurship and marketing.

Evangelina da Silva Sousa, Faculty of Economics, Administration, Actuarial and Accounting (FEAAC), Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

is Administrator of the Federal University of Piauí (UFPI). PhD in Administration and Controllership from the Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Master in Development and Environment from UFPI and Graduated in Administration from UFPI. Her research interests are sustainability, consumption, behavioral intent, and entrepreneurship.

Raimundo Eduardo Silveira Fontenele, Faculty of Economics, Administration, Actuarial and Accounting (FEAAC), Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

is full professor of the economic sciences course at the Federal University of Ceará (UFC) and of the Postgraduate Program in Administration and Controllership at UFC. PhD in Economic Sciences from the Université Sorbonne Paris-Nord, Master in Rural Economics from UFC and Graduated in Economic Sciences from the University of Fortaleza (UNIFOR). His areas of interest in Economics and Administration include Project Economic Assessment, Sustainable Development and Natural Resource Economics, Entrepreneurship, and Planning and Public Policy.

Tereza Cristina Batista de Lima, Faculty of Economics, Administration, Actuarial and Accounting (FEAAC), Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

is Associate Professor II at the Federal University of Ceará (UFC) and at the Postgraduate Program in Administration and Controllership at UFC. PhD in Education from UFC, Master in Psychology from Pontifical Catholic University (PUC/SP) and Graduated in Psychology from UFC. Her research interests are socialization, entrepreneurial behavior, gender and diversity.

References

Agolla, J. E., Monametsi, G. L., & Phera, P. (2019). Antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions amongst business students in a tertiary institution. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-06-2018-0037

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Alós, R., Esteban, F., Jódar, P., & Miguélez, F. (2015). Effects of prison work programmes on the employability of ex-prisoners. European Journal of Criminology, 12(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370814538776

Alstete, J. W. (2008). Aspects of entrepreneurial success. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(3), 584-594. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000810892364

Angulo-Guerrero, M. J., Pérez-Moreno, S., & Abad-Guerrero, I. M. (2017). How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries. Journal of Business Research, 73, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.017

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.

Barros, I. C. F., Madruga, L. R. D. R. G., Ávila, L. V., & Beuron, T. A. (2014). Atitude empreendedora na percepção de empreendedores individuais e sociais. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 8(21), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.11606/rco.v8i21.60067

Behling, G., Pereira, C. M. D., Mazzoleni, E. C., Baccin, S. S., & Lenzi, F. C. (2015). Microempreendedor individual catarinense: uma análise descritiva do perfil dos empreendedores individuais em Santa Catarina. Navus – Revista de Gestão e Tecnologia, 5(1), 65-78. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3504/350450615006.pdf

Block, J. H., & Wagner, M. (2010). Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs in Germany: characteristics and earnings differentials. Schmalenbach Business Review, 62(2), 154-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396803

Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial motivations: what do we still need to know? Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00312.x

Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., & Gatewood, E. J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 13-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00078-2

Cavazos-Arroyo, J., Puente-Díaz, R., & Agarwal, N. (2017). An examination of certain antecedents of social entrepreneurial intentions among Mexico residents. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 19(64), 180-199. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v19i64.3129

Cordeiro, A. M. (2019). A educação nas prisões. ID online – Revista Multidisciplinar e de Psicologia, 13(48), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.14295/idonline.v13i48.2155

Costelloe, A., & Langelid, T. (2011). Prison Education and Training in Europe – A review and commentary of existing literature, analysis and evaluation. Directorate General for Education and Culture, European Commission, EAC, 19, 106-130. Recuperado de https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:57679

Ephrem, A. N., Namatovu, R., & Basalirwa, E. M. (2019). Perceived social norms, psychological capital and entrepreneurial intention among undergraduate students in Bukavu. Education + Training, 61(7-8), 963-983. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2018-0212

Ferreira, A. S. M., Loiola, E., & Gondim, S. M. G. (2017). Preditores individuais e contextuais da intenção empreendedora entre universitários: revisão de literatura. Cadernos Ebape Br, 15(2), 292-308. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395159595

Ferri, L., Ginesti, G., Spano, R., & Zampella, A. (2019). Exploring factors motivating entrepreneurial intentions: the case of Italian university students. International Journal of Training and Development, 23(3), 202-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12158

Fossen, F. M., & Büttner, T. J. (2013). The returns to education for opportunity entrepreneurs, necessity entrepreneurs, and paid employees. Economics of Education Review, 37, 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.08.005

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). (2017). Empreendedorismo no Brasil 2016. Recuperado de https://www.gemconsortium.org/report

Governo do Estado do Ceará. (2017). Sejus entrega carrinhos de lanche para egressos do sistema penitenciário. Recuperado de https://www.ceara.gov.br/2017/05/25/sejus-entrega-carrinhos-de-lanche-para-egressos-do-sistema-penitenciario/

Gray, D. E. (2012). Pesquisa no mundo real (2a. ed.). Porto Alegre: Penso.

Grosholz, J. M., Kabongo, J. D., Morris, M. H., & Wichern, A. (2020). Entrepreneurship education in the transformation of incarcerated individuals: A Review of the literature and future research directions, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(15),1551-1570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20928020

Holzer, H. J., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. A. (2003). Employment barriers facing ex-offenders [Working Paper]. The Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable, Employment Dimensions of Re-Entry: Understanding the Nexus Between Prisoner Reentry and Work, New York, NY, USA.

Hoppe, A., Barcellos, M. D., Vieira, L. M., & Matos, C. A. (2012). Comportamento do consumidor de produtos orgânicos: uma aplicação da teoria do comportamento planejado. Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos – Base, 9(2), 174-188. https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2012.92.06

Ireland, T. D. (2012). Educação em prisões no Brasil: direito, contradições e desafios. Em Aberto, 24(86), 19-39.

Kautonen, T., & Palmroos, J. (2010). The impact of a necessity-based start-up on subsequent entrepreneurial satisfaction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(3), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0104-1

Keena, L., & Simmons, C. (2015). Rethink, reform, reenter: an entrepreneurial approach to prison programming. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(8), 837-854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14523077

Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and Cross-Cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x

Martins, F. S., Santos, E. B. A., & Silveira, A. (2018). Intenção empreendedora: categorização, classificação de constructos e proposição de modelo. Brazilian Business Review, 16(1), 46-62. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2019.16.1.4

Mcclelland, D. (1972). A sociedade competitiva: Realização e progresso social. Rio de Janeiro: Expressão e Cultura.

Moraes, C., Simões, D., & Gonçalves, E. (2017). Educação no cárcere: uma análise dos processos educativos no Centro de Reeducação Feminina de Ananindeua/Pará. Revista Pedagogia Social UFF, 2(2) 1-20.

Minola, T., Criaco, G., & Obschonka, M. (2016). Age, culture, and self-employment motivation. Small Business Economics, 46(2), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9685-6

Pastore, J. (2011). Trabalho para ex-infratores. São Paulo: Saraiva.

Patzelt, H., Williams, T. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2014). Overcoming the walls that constrain us: the role of entrepreneurship education programs in prison. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4), 587-620. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0094

Paul, J., Hermel, P., & Srivatava, A. (2017). Entrepreneurial intentions – theory and evidence from Asia, America, and Europe. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 15(3), 324-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-017-0208-1

Rodermund, E. S. (2004). Pathways to successful entrepreneurship: parenting, personality, early entrepreneurial competence and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(3), 498-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.007

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2004). Constructing corridors to economic primitives. Entrepreneurial opportunities as demand-side artifacts. In J. E. Butler (Ed.), Opportunity Identification and Entrepreneurial Behavior (pp. 291-312). Charlotte, USA: Information Age Publishing Inc.

Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a meta–analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 38(2), 291-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12087

Silva, C. L. O., & Saraiva, L. A. S. (2013). Lugares, discursos e subjetividades nas organizações: o caso de uma prisão. Cadernos Ebape Br, 11(3), 383-401. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512013000300005

Souza, E. M., Costa, A. S. M., & Lopes, B. C. (2019). Ressocialização, trabalho e resistência: mulheres encarceradas e a produção do sujeito delinquente. Cadernos Ebape Br, 17(2), 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395171382

Thiry-Cherques, H. R. (2009). Saturação em pesquisa qualitativa: estimativa empírica de dimensionamento. Revista PMKT, 3(2), 20-27.

Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). Outcome pattern matching and program theory. Evolution and Program Planning, 12(4), 355-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90052-9

Vale, G. M. V., Corrêa, V. S., & Reis, R. F. (2014). Motivações para o empreendedorismo: necessidade versus oportunidade? Revista de Administração Contemporânea,18(3), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20141612

Van der Zwan, P., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., & Hessels, J. (2016). Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. Eurasian Business Review, 6, 273-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-016-0065-1

Van Gelderen, M. (2010). Autonomy as the guiding aim of entrepreneurship education. Education + Training, 52(8-9), 710-721. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011089006

Vergara, S. C. (2003). Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em administração (4a. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

Wilson, D. B., Gallagher, C. A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of corrections-based education, vocation, and work programs for adult offenders. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 37(4), 347-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427800037004001

Yitshaki, R., & Kropp, F. (2016). Motivations and opportunity recognition of social entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 546-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12157

Published

2021-09-01

Métricas


Visualizações do artigo: 631     PDF (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 64 PDF downloads: 46

How to Cite

Albuquerque , L. C., Sousa, E. da S., Fontenele, R. E. S., & Lima, T. C. B. de. (2021). What to do when the cage opens? Entrepreneurial motivations and individual beliefs of former convicts. REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal, 10(3), e1938. https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.e1938

Issue

Section

Research article (Theoretical-empirical)