Desafios para a mensuração de Ecossistemas de Inovação e de Ecossistemas de Empreendedorismo no Brasil

Renata Lèbre La Rovere; Guilherme de Oliveira Santos; Bianca Louzada Xavier Vasconcellos

doi:10.14211/regepe.v10i1.1971

Authors

Renata Lèbre La Rovere Institute of Economics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, IE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5912-5500
Guilherme de Oliveira Santos Postgraduate Program in Public Policy, Strategy and Development at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, PPED/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-4745
Bianca Louzada Xavier Vasconcellos Postgraduate Program in Public Policy, Strategy and Development at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, PPED/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-7391

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v10i1.1971

Keywords:

Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Innovation Ecosystems, Metrics.

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to identify metrics and indicators of innovation ecosystems and entrepreneurial ecosystems and to discuss the limitations of these metrics in the Brazilian case. Theoretical framework: From a theoretical point of view, the paper contributes to the analysis of the differences and similarities between the concepts of innovation ecosystems and entrepreneurial ecosystems. From a methodological perspective, the paper proposes indicators and metrics and points out the limitations for measuring entrepreneurial and innovative ecosystems in Brazil. Design/methodology/approach: The study’s qualitative approach is based on a literature review, a documentary research, and data collection for the characterization of innovation ecosystems and entrepreneurial ecosystems. The paper identifies the main indicators and metrics, their data sources and the limitations of these indicators and metrics in the Brazilian case. Findings: It was observed that despite the existence of multiple data sources, the measurement of entrepreneurial ecosystems in Brazil entails constraints such as time lag of the data; voluntary filling of databases; lack of transparency at the regional level; and incomplete or skewed data. Research, Practical & Social implications: From a theoretical point of view, the paper contributes to the analysis of the differences and similarities between the concepts of innovation ecosystems and entrepreneurial ecosystems. From a methodological point of view, the study proposes indicators and metrics and points out the limitations for the measurement of entrepreneurial and innovative ecosystems in Brazil. Originality/value: When identifying limitations, the paper proposes alternatives to improve the measurement of innovation ecosystems and entrepreneurial ecosystems in the country and in its different regions. This is essential for designing and monitoring public policies to support innovation, especially those aimed to support entrepreneurs and small businesses.

JEL CODE: O30, L26

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Renata Lèbre La Rovere, Institute of Economics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, IE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ

Renata Lèbre La Rovere is a professor at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ). Professor La Rovere holds a PhD in Economics from the Paris Diderot University (Université de Paris VII - Université Denis Diderot) (1990), France, and a master’s degree in Productive Structures and World Systems (Structures Productives Et Systeme Mondial) from the Paris Diderot University (Université de Paris VII - Université Denis Diderot) (1986), France. Her research interests are: the geography of Innovation; entrepreneurship; Innovation and knowledge at the enterprise level; communication and information technologies; and local development.

Guilherme de Oliveira Santos, Postgraduate Program in Public Policy, Strategy and Development at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, PPED/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ

Guilherme de Oliveira Santos is a researcher at the innovation economics research group from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ) and an advisor to the technology directorate of the foundation for research support of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, FAPERJ). He holds a master’s and a doctor’s degree from the Public Policy, Strategy and Development program at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (2016 and 2020), Brazil. His research interests are: the geography of Innovation; regional Innovation systems; entrepreneurship ecosystems; policies to support entrepreneurship; and mission-oriented Innovation policies.

Bianca Louzada Xavier Vasconcellos, Postgraduate Program in Public Policy, Strategy and Development at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, PPED/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ

Bianca Louzada Xavier Vasconcellos is a doctoral student from the Public Policy, Strategy and Development program at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ) and a researcher at the Innovation Economics Research Group at the UFRJ. She holds a master’s degree in Territorial Development and Public Policies at the Rural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, UFRRJ) (2016), Brazil. Her research interests are: Economics and regional development; the industrial production structure of the state of Rio de Janeiro; regional economic complexity and Innovation; structural changes and manufacturing industries. E-mail: bianca.ufrrj@gmail.com

References

ABStartups – Associação brasileira de Startups. (2018). O momento da startup brasileira e o futuro do ecossistema de inovação. Recuperado de https://docplayer.com.br/108314894-O-momento-da-startup-brasileira-e-o-futuro-do-ecossistema-de-inovacao.html

Anjos do Brasil. (2019). Anjos pelo Brasil – Núcleos Regionais. Recuperado de http://www.anjosdobrasil.net/nuacutecleos-regionais.html

Aranha, J. A. (2016). Mecanismos de geração de empreendimentos inovadores. Mudanças na organização e na dinâmica dos ambientes e o surgimento de novos atores. Brasília, DF: Anprotec. https://informativo.anprotec.org.br/ebook-serie-tendencias-mecanismos-de-geracao-de-empreendimentos-inovadores

Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893-904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126

Audrestch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1030-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8

Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (1995). Flexible Re-Cycling and High-Technology Entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 37(3), 62-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165799

Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893-919. https://doi.org/10.1086/261712

Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic geography, 85(3), 289-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x

BNDES – Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social. (2017). A importância do capital de risco para a inovação. Recuperado de https://www.bndes.gov.br/wps/portal/site/home/conhecimento/noticias/noticia/capital-de-risco

Bruns, K., Bosma, N., Sanders, M., & Schramm, M. (2017). Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A regional cross‐section growth regression approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9866-6

Carayannis, E., Goletsis, Y., & Grigoroudis, E. (2018). Composite innovation metrics: MCDA and the quadruple innovation helix framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.008

Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., & Los, B. (2015). Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: an analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies, 49(5), 767-781. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.940305

Cowell, M., Hill, S. L., & Tate, S. (2018). It takes all kinds: understanding diverse entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 12(2), 178-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-08-2017-0064

Credit, K., Mack, E. A., & Mayer, H. (2018). State of the field: Data and metrics for geographic analyses of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass, 12(9), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12380

Data Viva. (2019). A maior plataforma de visualização de dados sociais e econômicos do Brasil. Recuperado de http://dataviva.info/pt/

Dawkins, R. (2007). O Gene Egoísta. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Dubini, P. (1989). The influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: Some hints for public policies. Journal of Business Venturing, 4, 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(89)90031-1

Farris, P., Bendle, N., Pfeifer, P., & Reibstein, D. (2015). Marketing metrics: The manager’s guide to measuring marketing performance. Upper Saddle River, Nova Jersey: FT Press.

Feld, B. (2012). Startup Communities: building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Feldman, M. P. (2014). The character of innovative places: Entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9574-4

Fernández-Fernández, M. T. F., Jiménez, F. J. B., & Roura, J. R. C. (2015). Business incubation: Innovative services in an entrepreneurship ecosystem. The Service Industries Journal, 35(14), 783-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2015.1080243

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic policy: Lessons from Japan. London, EN: Pinter.

Frenken, K. (2006). Innovation, Evolution, and Complexity Theory. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296

Furtado, B. A., Sakowski, P. A. M., & Távola, M. H. (2015). Modelagem de sistemas complexos para políticas públicas. Modelagem de sistemas complexos para políticas públicas. Brasília, DF: IPEA. https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&id=25860&Itemid=383

Gomes, K, A, V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2016). Unpacking the innovation system construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 136, 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009

Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., & Simões, A. (2013). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Cambridge, Massachusetts USA: Mit Press. https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/files/growthlab/files/atlas_2013_part1.pdf

IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2018). Demografia das empresas e estatísticas de empreendedorismo: 2016. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Departamento de Estudos e Pesquisas/Informação Econômica, IBGE. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101612.pdf

Isenberg, D. J. (2010). The big idea: How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50. https://hbr.org/2010/06/the-big-idea-how-to-start-an-entrepreneurial-revolution

Jackson, D. D. (2011). What is an Innovation Ecosystem? Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Deborah_Jackson2/publication/266414637_What_is_an_Innovation_Ecosystem/links/551438490cf2eda0df30714f.pdf

Kshetri, N. (2014). Developing successful entrepreneurial ecosystems: Lessons from a comparison of an Asian tiger and a Baltic tiger. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(3), 330-356. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-09-2013-0146

Lafuente, E., Yancy, V., & Rialp, J. (2007). Regional Differences in the Influence of Role Models: Comparing the Entrepreneurial Process of Rural Catalonia. Regional Studies, 41(6), 779-795. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120247

Liguori, E., Bendickson, J., Solomon, S., & McDowell, W. C. (2019). Development of a multi-dimensional measure for assessing entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(1-2), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1537144

Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National Systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London, EN: Pinter.

Mack, E., & Mayer, H. (2016). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118-2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547

Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, 30(1), 77-102. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf

Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: the new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86. https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition

Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic geography, 87(3), 237-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x

Nelson, R. (2018). Economics from an Evolutionary Perspective. In Nelson, R. et al. (Orgs.) Modern Evolutionary Economics – An Overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108661928

Neumeyer, X., & Santos, S. C. (2018). Sustainable Business Models, Venture Typologies, and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Social Network Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4565-4579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.216

Nicotra, M., Romano, M., Del Giudice, M., & Schillaci, C. E. (2017). The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: a measurement framework. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 640-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9628-2

Nylund, P. A., & Cohen, B. (20170. Collision density: driving growth in urban entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(3), 757-776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0424-5

O’Connor, S., Stam, E., Sussan, F., & Audrestch, D. B. (2018). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: The Foundations of Place-Based Renewal. In O´Connor, S., Stam, E., Sussan, F., & Audrestch, D. B (Eds.). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Place-Based Transformations and Transitions (pp. 1-21). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63531-6_1

Oh, D. S., Philipps, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation Ecosystem: a critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004

Pennings, J. M. (1982). The urban quality of life and entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.5465/256024

Santos, G. (2016). Alinhamento das incubadoras de empresas ao contexto regional no estado do Rio de Janeiro: uma comparação entre metrópole e interior (Dissertação de mestrado). Instituto de Economia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Santos, G., & Marcellino, I. (2016). Mensuração das Bases de Conhecimento de regiões selecionadas do Sistema de Inovação Fluminense. In Osório, M., Magalhães, A. F., & Versiani, M. H. (Orgs.). Rio de Janeiro: reflexões e práticas (1. ed., pp. 99-125). Belo Horizonte, MG: Editora Fórum.

Sapsed, J., Grantham, A., & Defillipi, R. (2007). A bridge over troubled waters: Bridging organisations and entrepreneurial opportunities in emerging sectors. Research Policy, 36, 1314-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.003

Sebrae/MG. (2019). Índice Sebrae de desenvolvimento econômico local – Isdel: notas metodológicas 2018. Belo Horizonte: Sebrae/MG. https://3341cfed-e2eb-48a8-933e-b470d523d32f.filesusr.com/ugd/d0f56d_167f2fdcdfce4107b01c8197075a6bcd.pdf

Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2017). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12, 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268

Stam, E. (2018). Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. In O’Connor, A., Stam, E., Sussan, F., & Audrestch, D. (Eds.). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Place-based Transformations and Transitions. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63531-6

Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems [Discussion Paper Series nº 16-13]. Utretch University: School of Economics, The Netherlands. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/347982/16_13.pdf

Urti, M. C. T. (2017). Interações entre o Sistema de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação e o Sistema de Saúde no Brasil (2000-2014): uma análise a partir da perspectiva do conhecimento e a inovação para a inclusão social (Tese de doutorado). Instituto de Economia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Van de Ven, A. (1993). The Development of an Infrastructure for Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90028-4

Vieira, J. M. (2013). Possibilidades de aplicação da análise de entropia nas Ciências Sociais e na Demografia. Ideias, 4, 52-69. https://doi.org/10.20396/ideias.v4i0.8649412

Wallner, T., & Menrad, M. (2011). Extending the Innovation Ecosystem Framework. Proceedings of the ISPM Conference, Hamburg, Germany, 22. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Extending-the-Innovation-Ecosystem-Framework-Wallner-Menrad/2b2c9911cea2259692286c178a9fbc5d8d550157

Xu, Z., & Maas, G. (2019). Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems as Important Building Blocks. In Maas, G., & Jones, P. (Eds.). Transformational Entrepreneurship Practices. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11524-1_2