A Gestão da Inovação como prática: Contribuições do conceito de Gestão Ordinária

Bárbara do Nascimento Alves; Andreza de Amorim Lima Ferreira; Emanuela Ribeiro Lins; Elisabeth Cavalcante dos Santos

doi:10.14211/regepe.v10i1.1862

Authors

Bárbara do Nascimento Alves barbara_gus@hotmail.com
Graduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption at the Federal University of Pernambuco, PPGIC/UFPE-CAA, Caruaru, PE
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-2063
Andreza de Amorim Lima Ferreira andrezamorim15@gmail.com
Graduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption at the Federal University of Pernambuco, PPGIC/UFPE-CAA, Caruaru, PE
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0397-4447
Emanuela Ribeiro Lins linsmanu41@gmail.com
Graduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption at the Federal University of Pernambuco, PPGIC/UFPE-CAA, Caruaru, PE
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-6840
Elisabeth Cavalcante dos Santos elisabethcsantos@gmail.com
Graduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption at the Federal University of Pernambuco, PPGIC/UFPE-CAA, Caruaru, PE
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-7290

DOI:

10.14211/regepe.v10i1.1862

Keywords:

Innovation management, Ordinary management, Everyday practices.

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the practices of ordinary management as a complement to the approaches of innovation management. Methodology/approach: an exploratory research was carried out through a bibliographic survey. Main results: ordinary management as an aid to innovation management approaches explains how individuals can do different activities in a collective and contextualized way to be able to carry out all the innovation work, and can give opportunities to the manager to conduct and reposition the activities that are carried out in the organizational routine. Theoretical/methodological contributions: this research presents a relevant discussion of how the daily work of the people who make up the organization allows to build a more integrated knowledge about all the processes that involve the complexity of innovation. Relevance/originality: the ordinary management can be a useful theoretical tool for understanding innovation management in practice and taking a new look at understanding the organization and its interactions, considering it as a process, where the different ways of doing and the knowledge of individuals is important for the real work of innovation. Social/management contributions: the relationship between innovation management and ordinary management approaches gives greater attention to the work of individuals in innovation processes and considering the idiosyncrasies present in the organizational environment of peripheral contexts.

JEL CODE: M19

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Bárbara do Nascimento Alves, Graduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption at the Federal University of Pernambuco, PPGIC/UFPE-CAA, Caruaru, PE

Bárbara do Nascimento Alves is Professor at Uninassau, Garanhuns, PE, Brazil. Master’s student of the Postgraduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption (PPGIC) by UFPE-CAA, Caruaru, PR, Brazil. Specialist in Business and People Management by the Higher Education Authority of Garanhuns (AESGA). Bachelor of Business Administration from the Higher Education Authority of Garanhuns (AESGA). Objective: to analyze the practices of ordinary management as a complement to the approaches of innovation management. Methodology/approach: an exploratory research was carried out through a bibliographic survey. Main results: ordinary management as an aid to innovation management approaches explains how individuals can do different activities in a collective and contextualized way to be able to carry out all the innovation work, and can give opportunities to the manager to conduct and reposition the activities that are carried out in the organizational routine. Theoretical/methodological contributions: this research presents a relevant discussion of how the daily work of the people who make up the organization allows to build a more integrated knowledge about all the processes that involve the complexity of innovation. Relevance/originality: the ordinary management can be a useful theoretical tool for understanding innovation management in practice and taking a new look at understanding the organization and its interactions, considering it as a process, where the different ways of doing and the knowledge of individuals is important for the real work of innovation. Social/management contributions: the relationship between innovation management and ordinary management approaches gives greater attention to the work of individuals in innovation processes and considering the idiosyncrasies present in the organizational environment of peripheral contexts.

Andreza de Amorim Lima Ferreira, Graduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption at the Federal University of Pernambuco, PPGIC/UFPE-CAA, Caruaru, PE

Andreza de Amorim Lima Ferreira is Technical Degree Teacher, Caruaru, PE, Brazil. Master’s student of the Postgraduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption (PPGIC) by UFPE-CAA, Caruaru, PE, Brazil. Bachelor of Business Administration from UFPE-CAA.

Emanuela Ribeiro Lins, Graduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption at the Federal University of Pernambuco, PPGIC/UFPE-CAA, Caruaru, PE

Emanuela Ribeiro Lins has worked as a Personal Development Analyst at the Department of Education and Sports of Iguaracy, PE, Brazil. Master’s student of the Post-Graduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption (PPGIC) by Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Agreste Academic Center (CAA). Bachelor of Business Administration from the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Academic Unit of Serra Talhada (UAST).

Elisabeth Cavalcante dos Santos, Graduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption at the Federal University of Pernambuco, PPGIC/UFPE-CAA, Caruaru, PE

Elisabeth Cavalcante dos Santos is an Adjunct Professor at the Agreste Academic Center at the Federal University of Pernambuco (CAA/UFPE). Permanent professor of the Postgraduate Program in Management, Innovation and Consumption (PPGIC). Researcher and coordinator of Grupo Vivências. Ph.D in Business Administration from the Graduate Program in Business Administration at UFPB (2014-2016). Master in Business Administration from the Graduate Program in Business Administration at UFPE (2011-2013). Graduated in Business Administration from CAA/UFPE (2006-2010). Her research Interests include Organizational Practices; Inequalities and Power in Organizing; Resistance practices; Peripheral contexts; Popular Cultures.

References

Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: a review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x

Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578

Barros, A., & Carrieri, A. P. (2015). O cotidiano e a história: construindo novos olhares na administração. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(2),151-161. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020150205

Bin, A., & Salles-Filho, S. L. M. (2012). Science, technology and innovation management: contributions to a methodological framework. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(2), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000200007

Bispo, M. (2013). Estudos Baseados em Prática: conceitos, história e perspectivas. Revista Interdisciplinar de Gestão Social – RIGS, 2(1),13-33. https://doi.org/10.9771/23172428rigs.v2i1.10058

Bispo, M. (2015). Methodological Reflections on Practice-Based Research in Organization Studies. Brazilian Administration Review – BAR, 12(3), art. 5, 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2015150026

Bispo, M., Soares, L. C., & Cavalcante, E. D. (2014). Panorama dos estudos sobre prática no Brasil: uma análise da produção. In Anais do Encontro Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 38.

Brasil. (2004). Lei nº 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004 – Lei da Inovação. Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2004/lei/l10.973.htm

Carrieri, A. P., Perdigão, D. A., & Aguiar, A. R. C. (2014). A gestão ordinária dos pequenos negócios: outro olhar sobre a gestão em estudos organizacionais. Revista de Administração, 49(4), 698-713. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1178

Carrieri, A. P. et al. (2018). A Gestão Ordinária e suas práticas: o caso da Cafeteria Will Coffee. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 12, e141359. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2018.141359

Carvalho, H. G., Reis, D. R., & Cavalcante, M. B. (2011). Gestão da Inovação. Curitiba: Aymará.

Certeau, M. (1998). A invenção do cotidiano: artes de fazer (3. ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Vozes.

Cohendet, P., & Simon, L. (2017). Concepts and Models of Innovation. The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation (pp. 33-55). Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781782548515/9781782548515.00009.xml

Cooper, R. G. (1994). Third-Generation New Product Processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1110003

Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6),1154-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x

Czarniawska, B. (2013). Organizations as obstacles to organizing. In Robichaud, D. & Cooren, F. (Eds.), Organizations and organizing materiality, agency, and discourse (pp. 3-22). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094471

Dougherty, D. (2017). Innovation in Practice. The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation (pp. 138-151). Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548522

Duarte, M. F., & Alcadipani, R. (2016). Contribuições do organizar para os estudos organizacionais. Organizações e Sociedade, 23(76), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9230763

Duran, M. C. G. (2007). Maneiras de pensar o cotidiano com Michel de Certeau. Diálogo Edu, 7(22), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.7213/rde.v7i22.4177

Fayter, E. A. (Org.). (2010). Gerenciar a Inovação: um desafio para as empresas. Curitiba: IEL/PR.

Feldman, M., & Pentland, B. (2003). Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620

Gavira, M. O. (2008). Gestão da inovação em subsidiárias de multinacionais do setor eletroeletrônico instalado no Brasil (Tese de doutorado). Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Geociências, Campinas, SP, Brasil.

Gil, A. C. (2017). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisas (6. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

Glückler, J., & Bathelt, H. (2017). Institutional Context and Innovation. The Elgar companion to innovation and knowledge creation (pp. 121-137). Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548522.00015

Godin, B. (2017). A Conceptual History of Innovation. The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation (pp. 25-32). Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548522.00008

Gouvêa, J. B. et al. (2018). As histórias e o cotidiano nas organizações: uma possibilidade de dar ouvidos àqueles que o discurso hegemônico cala. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Organizacionais, 5(12), 297-347. https://doi.org/10.25113/farol.v5i12.3668

Grandori, A. (2010). A Rational Heuristic Model of Economic Decision Making. Rationality and society, 22(4), 477-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463110383972

Grant, D. et al. (2004). Introduction: organizational discourse: exploring the field. In: D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds). The sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 1-36). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122.n1

Héraud, J. A. (2017). Science and Innovation. The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation (pp. 56-74). Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548522.00010

Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. A. (2017). Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica (8. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

Latour, B. (2011). What’s the story? Organizing as a mode of existence. In Passoth, J. H., Peuker, B., & Schillmeier, M. (Org.), Agency without actors? New approaches to collective action. London: Routledge.

Lopes, A. P. V. B. V., Kissimoto, K. O., Salerno, M. S., Laurindo, F. J., & Carvalho, M. C. (2012). Innovation management: a literature review about the evolution and the different innovation models. In Proceedings of International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 1-8), Rio de Janeiro, RJ.

Machado, N. S., Luchese, G. T., & Bencke, F. F. (2019). Gestão da Inovação: O caso da celulose Irani (SC). Rasi, 5(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.5.1.258

Martins, J. S. (2008). A sociabilidade do homem simples: cotidiano e história na modernidade anômala. São Paulo: Contexto. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-8099.pcso.2009.74600

Melo, C. (1999). Inovações na gestão em saúde no âmbito local. São Paulo. (Projeto de Tese de Doutorado apresentado para qualificação à Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP.)

Melo, C., & Tanaka, O. Y. (2002). O desafio da inovação na gestão em saúde no Brasil: uma nova abordagem teórico-empírica. Revista de Administração Pública – RAP, 36(2), 195-211. http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rap/article/view/6436

Mendes, D. R. F., De Oliveira, M. Â. C., & Pinheiro, A. A. (2013). Política Nacional de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação: avaliação do marco regulatório e seus impactos nos indicadores de inovação. Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas – Regepe, 2(1), 22-46. https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v2i1.49

Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., & Yanow, D. (2009). Return to practice: an introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1309-1327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349860

Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work, & organization: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

OECD (Organisation For Economic Co-Operation and Development). (2005). Manual de Oslo: diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação (3. ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Arti/Finep. http://www.finep.gov.br/images/apoio-e-financiamento/manualoslo.pdf

O’Connor, G. C., Leifer, R., Paulson, A. S., & Peters, L. S. (2008). Grabbing Lightning: Building a Capability for Breakthrough Innovation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley Sons.

Pfitzner, M. S., Salles-Filho, S. L. M., & Brittes, J. L. P. (2016). Gestão da Inovação Tecnológica nas Organizações: Proposta de um Modelo Teórico-Conceitual Aplicável a Empresas do Setor Elétrico Brasileiro. Desafio Online, 2(1),131-150. http://www.desafioonline.ufms.br

Pimentel, R. (2019). Cultura de inovação em uma escola de negócios: Um estudo inspirado pela teoria da prática. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa – Recadm, 18(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2019003

Pimentel, R., & Nogueira, E. E. S. (2018). Estudos baseados na prática: possibilidades metodológicas para pesquisas em estudos organizacionais. Organizações e Sociedades, 25(86), 350-370. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9250861

Pimentel, R., Loiola, G. F., & Diogo, T. M. (2020). Cultura de inovação e aprendizagem: o programa clube dos apaixonados por desafios. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 21(4), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramg200129

Pugh, S. (1991). Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering. Harlow, England: Addison Wesley.

Quadros, R. (2008). Aprendendo a inovar: padrões de gestão da inovação tecnológica em empresas industriais brasileiras. Campinas: CNPQ. https://silo.tips/download/campinas-agosto-de-2008

Rates, H. F., Cavalcante, R. B., Santos, R. C. D., & Alves, M. (2019). Cotidiano de trabalho em enfermagem sob a ótica de Michel de Certeau. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem – Reben, 72(1), 341-345. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0361

Reichert, F. M., Camboim, G. F., & Zawislak, P. A. (2015). Capacidades e Trajetórias de Inovação de Empresas Brasileiras. RAM Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 16(5),161-194. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712015/administracao.v16n5p161-194

Sá, M. G. (2018). Filhos das Feiras: uma composição do campo de negócios agreste. Recife: Fundação Joaquim Nabuco: Editora Massangana.

Salerno, M. S., Marx, R., Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A. de, Mello, A. M. de, & Lima, W. D. de. (2009). Organização e gestão da cadeia de valor expandida da empresa. In Anais do Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção – ENEGEP, Salvador, BA, 29.

Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338-360. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0183

Santos, L. L. S., & Silveira, R. A. (2015). Por uma epistemologia das práticas organizacionais: a contribuição de Theodore Schatzki. Organizações e Sociedade, 22(72), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9230724

Schatzki, T. R. (2003). A new societist social ontology. Philosophy of the social sciences, 33(2), 174-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103033002002

Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On Organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863-1873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606071942

Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1957). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University.

Silva, D. O et al. (2014). Modelos para a gestão da inovação: revisão e análise da literatura. Production, 24(2), 477-490. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132013005000059

Silva, G., & Dacorso, A. L. R. (2013). Inovação aberta como uma vantagem competitiva para a micro e pequena empresa. INMR - Innovation & Management Review, 10(3), 251-268. Recuperado de https://www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/79337

Smith, M., Busi, M., Ball, P., & Van der Meer, R. (2008). Factors influencing and organisation’s ability to manage innovation: a structured literature review and conceptual model. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(4), 655-676. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919608002138

Terra, J. C. et al. (2012). 10 dimensões da gestão da inovação: uma abordagem para a transformação organizacional. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.

Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2008). Gestão da Inovação (3. ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Vale, L. M. E., & Joaquim, N. F. (2017). Legumes nossos de cada dia: o hortifrúti na história da gestão ordinária do mercado central de Belo Horizonte. Revista Gestão & Conexões, 6(2), 54-73. https://doi.org/10.13071/regec.2317-5087.2017.6.2.13428.54-73

Vargas, R. A., & Junquilho, G. S. (2013). Funções administrativas ou práticas? As “artes do fazer” gestão na Escola Mirante. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 15(35), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2013v15n35p180

Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2014). Innovation management tools: implementing technology watch as a routine for adaptation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(9), 1073-1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.944150