Manuscript Evaluation Form: Methodological article
Article Title
1. Writing*
The writing is clear, objective, and concise. The separation of the text into sections and subsections is pertinent and facilitates the reading process.
2. Domain*
The author(s) of the article provide a clear demonstration of the main applications and other highlights of the technique, procedure, or method under analysis.
3. Presentation*
The article presents the application of the technique, procedure, or method in real research contexts in the field of research in a clear and engaging manner, accompanied by illustrative examples.
4. Further research*
The article contributes to the field of research by providing valuable methodological information that can be utilized by researchers in future research based on the discussion presented.
5. General Evaluation*
Please provide a qualitative assessment of the manuscript in the space below. It is recommended that comments be provided on each of the items evaluated above, and that they be as clear and specific as possible. This space is also intended for general comments that could lead to an improvement in the manuscript. Such comments may pertain to the structure of the manuscript (division of sections/subsections), the manner in which the results are presented (graphs, tables, etc.), or other useful comments for the authors.
6. Reviewer Conclusion*
(Recommendation):
7. In compliance with Open Science, we ask if you (reviewer) agree with the publication of the manuscript evaluation reports, according to the following options:*
