Evaluación de la validez del Global Entrepreneurship Index

Autores/as

  • Eduardo Avancci Dionisio Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5301-9301
  • Dirceu Silva Facultad de Educación (FE), Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas/SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3267-511X
  • Ruy Quadros Carvalho Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-8064
  • Edmundo Inácio Júnior Facultad de Ciencias Aplicadas (FCA), Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas/SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-0778

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14211/ibjesb.e2050

Palabras clave:

Sistema Nacional de Emprendimiento, Ecosistema de Emprendimiento, Índice compuesto

Resumen

Objetivo: nuestro objetivo es evaluar si el Global Entrepreneurship Index es un método válido para medir los sistemas nacionales de emprendimiento. Método: para lograr el objetivo, realizamos un modelado de ecuaciones estructurales para medir el modelo formativo del Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI), utilizando el software SmartPLS 3.0, con el fin de verificar si los indicadores del GEI son convergentes para los constructos; la colinealidad de los indicadores y su relevancia para medir el espíritu empresarial a nivel de país. Originalidad/Relevancia: si bien el GEI se basa em las recomendaciones de la OCDE para la construcción de indicadores compuestos (índices), no hemos identificado ningún estudio (ni siquiera realizado por los desarrolladores del GEI) sobre la validez del índice como instrumento de medición del emprendimiento. Resultados: los resultados obtenidos muestran que los subíndices e indicadores son adecuados para medir el emprendimiento. Sin embargo, identificamos que existe la necesidad de reemplazar los componentes a nivel micro de los indicadores “opportunity perception” y “networking” que brindan resultados distorsionados de lo que se entiende como emprendimiento productivo o de alto impacto. Contribuciones teóricas/metodológicas: las principales contribuciones de nuestro estúdio están dirigidas a los desarrolladores de indicadores. Sugerimos el uso de componentes que capturen aspectos asociados con el emprendimiento de alto impacto o de base tecnológica en lugar de cualquier intento de crear un nuevo negocio, ya que nuestros resultados indican que los componentes genéricos brindan resultados miopes sobre el estado del emprendimiento, dificultando los estudios comparativos a nivel del país.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Eduardo Avancci Dionisio, Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil

es profesor del área de administración del Instituto Federal de Ciencia y Tecnología de São Paulo (IFSP). Tiene una maestría de la UNICAMP y una licenciatura de la FATEC. Sus áreas de interés incluyen emprendimiento productivo, ecosistemas emprendedores e innovación. Sus artículos han sido publicados en revistas como Technology Forecasting and Social Change y Journal of Intellectual Capital.

Dirceu Silva, Facultad de Educación (FE), Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas/SP, Brasil

es profesor de la Facultad de Educación de la Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Tiene doctorado, maestría y licenciatura, todos de la USP. Sus áreas de interés incluyen Administración, Producción, Emprendimiento, Salud y Educación. Sus artículos han sido publicados en revistas como Process Safety and Environmental Protection y Asia-Pacific Journal Of Business Administration.

Ruy Quadros Carvalho, Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil

es profesor del Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica de la Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Tiene un doctorado de la Universidad de Sussex, una maestría de la UNICAMP y una licenciatura de la EAESP/FGV. Sus áreas de interés incluyen la innovación, la gestión de la innovación tecnológica, la evaluación de proyectos de I+D+i. Sus artículos han sido publicados en revistas como Latin American Business Review y Research Policy.

Edmundo Inácio Júnior, Facultad de Ciencias Aplicadas (FCA), Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas/SP, Brasil

es profesor de la Facultad de Ciencias Aplicadas de la Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Tiene un doctorado de la UNICAMP, una maestría de la UFPR y una licenciatura de la UEM. Sus áreas de interés incluyen innovación, emprendimiento y ecosistemas emprendedores. Sus artículos han sido publicados en Technology Forecasting and Social Change y en International Journal on Management of Innovation & Technology.

Citas

Ács, Z. J., Åstebro, T., Audretsch, D., & Robinson, D. T. (2016). Public policy to promote entrepreneurship: a call to arms. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9712-2

Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016

Ács, Z. J., & Correa, P. (2014). Identifying the Obstacles to High-Impact Entrepreneurship in Latin America and the Caribbean. GMU School of Public Policy Research Paper, (5), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2534412

Ács, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2018a). Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 501-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9

Ács, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2009). The Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEINDEX). Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 5(5), 341-435. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000027

Ács, Z. J., Szerb, L., Autio, E., & Lloyd, A. (2018b). The Global Entrepreneurship Index 2018. The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute. New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03279-1

Ali, A., Kelley, D. J., & Levie, J. (2020). Market-driven entrepreneurship and institutions. Journal of Business Research, 113, 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.010

Amorós, J. E., Cristi, O., & Naudé, W. (2021). Entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: Does the motivation to start-up a firm matter? Journal of Business Research, 127, 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.044

Asante, E. A., & Affum-Osei, E. (2019). Entrepreneurship as a career choice: The impact of locus of control on aspiring entrepreneurs’ opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Research, 98, 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.006

Atiase, V. Y., Mahmood, S., Wang, Y., & Botchie, D. (2018). Developing entrepreneurship in Africa: investigating critical resource challenges. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(4), 644-666. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2017-0084

Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8

Autio, E., & Fu, K. (2014). Economic and political institutions and entry into formal and informal entrepreneurship. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9381-0

Autio, E., & Rannikko, H. (2016). Retaining winners: Can policy boost high-growth entrepreneurship? Research Policy, 45(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.002

Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2016). Creativity, entrepreneurship and economic development: city-level evidence on creativity spillover of entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1354-1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9446-3

Beynon, M. J., Jones, P., & Pickernell, D. (2020). Country-level entrepreneurial attitudes and activity through the years: A panel data analysis using fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 115, 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.021

Bido, D. de S., & Da Silva, D. (2019). SmartPLS 3: especificação, estimação, avaliação e relato. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 20(2), 488-536. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2019.v20n2.1545

Bogatyreva, K., Edelman, L. F., Manolova, T. S., Osiyevskyy, O., & Shirokova, G. (2019). When do entrepreneurial intentions lead to actions? The role of national culture. Journal of Business Research, 96, 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.034

Bogetoft, P. (2012). Performance Benchmarking. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6043-5

Bosma, N., Hill, S., Ionescu-Somers, A., Kelley, D., Levie, J., & Tarnawa, A. (2020). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2019/2020 Global Report. London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association and London Business School. Retrived from https://www.babson.edu/media/babson/assets/global-entrepreneurship-monitor/2019-2020-GEM-Global-Report.pdf

Bosma, N., & Sternberg, R. (2014). Entrepreneurship as an urban event? Empirical evidence from European cities. Regional Studies, 48(6), 1016-1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.904041

Bruns, K., Bosma, N., Sanders, M., & Schramm, M. (2017). Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9866-6

Buenstorf, G., & Costa, C. (2018). Drivers of spin-off performance in industry clusters: Embodied knowledge or embedded firms? Research Policy, 47(3), 663-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.015

Cervelló-Royo, R., Moya-Clemente, I., Perelló-Marín, M. R., & Ribes-Giner, G. (2020). Sustainable development, economic and financial factors, that influence the opportunity-driven entrepreneurship. An fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 115, 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.031

Chang, Y.-Y., & Chen, M.-H. (2020). Creative entrepreneurs’ creativity, opportunity recognition, and career success: Is resource availability a double-edged sword? European Management Journal, 38(5), 750-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.03.004

Cieślik, J., Kaciak, E., & Van Stel, A. (2018). Country-level determinants and consequences of overconfidence in the ambitious entrepreneurship segment. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 36(5), 473-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242617748201

De Bernardi, P., & Azucar, D. (2020). Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Structure, Boundaries, and Dynamics. In Innovation in Food Ecosystems: Entrepreneurship for a Sustainable Future (pp. 73-104). New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33502-1_3

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6

Dutta, N., & Meierrieks, D. (2021). Financial development and entrepreneurship. International Review of Economics & Finance, 73, 114-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.01.002

Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations (1st ed.). London, England: Pinter Publisher Ltd.

Farinha, L., Lopes, J., Bagchi-Sen, S., Sebastião, J. R., & Oliveira, J. (2020). Entrepreneurial dynamics and government policies to boost entrepreneurship performance. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 72, 100950.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100950

Feld, B. (2012). Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Fredström, A., Peltonen, J., & Wincent, J. (2021). A country-level institutional perspective on entrepreneurship productivity: The effects of informal economy and regulation. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106002

Freeman, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.

Fuster, E., Padilla-Meléndez, A., Lockett, N., & Del-Águila-Obra, A. R. (2019). The emerging role of university spin-off companies in developing regional entrepreneurial university ecosystems: The case of Andalusia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.020

GEM. (2017). Global Report 2016/17. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association. Retrived from https://www.gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=49812

González-Uribe, J., & Reyes, S. (2021). Identifying and boosting “Gazelles”: Evidence from business accelerators. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(1), 260-287.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.012

Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1238-1249.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.012

Hair, J. F., Hult, T. G., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage Publications Inc.

Hamdi-Kidar, L., & Vellera, C. (2018). Triggers entrepreneurship among creative consumers. Journal of Business Research, 92, 465-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.018

Huynh, T., Patton, D., Arias-Aranda, D., & Molina-Fernández, L. M. (2017). University spin-off’s performance: Capabilities and networks of founding teams at creation phase. Journal of Business Research, 78, 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.015

Inácio Jr., E., Dionisio, E. A., Fischer, B. B., Li, Y., & Meissner, D. (2021). The global entrepreneurship index as a benchmarking tool? Criticisms from an efficiency perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(1), 190-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0218

Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50.

Kantis, H., Federico, J., & García, S. I. (2018). Opening the black box of ecosystem diversity around the globe: The Index of Dynamic Entrepreneurship (IDE) (1st ed.). Santa Fé, Argentina: Asociación Civil Red Pymes Mercosur.

Kaya, M. C., & Persson, L. (2019). A theory of gazelle growth: Competition, venture capital finance and policy. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 50, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.101019

Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An Overview of Innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth (275-306). Washington, USA: National Academy of Sciences.

Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. The Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483-499.

Kuratko, D. F. (2009). The entrepreneurial imperative of the 21st century. Business Horizons, 52(5), 421-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.04.006

Kurato, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2008). The concept of corporate entrepreneurship. In V. K. Narayanan & G. G. O’Connor (Eds.), Encyclopedia of technology and innovation management (pp. 207-214). New Jersey, USA: Blackwell Publishers.

Lafuente, E., Ács, Z. J., Sanders, M., & Szerb, L. (2020). The global technology frontier: productivity growth and the relevance of Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 55(1), 153-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00140-1

Lafuente, E., Szerb, L., & Ács, Z. J. (2016). Country level efficiency and national systems of entrepreneurship: a data envelopment analysis approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1260-1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9440-9

Landström, H., Åström, F., & Harirchi, G. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship studies: one or two fields of research? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 493-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0282-3

Lassalle, P., Johanson, M., Nicholson, J. D., & Ratajczak-Mrozek, M. (2020). Migrant entrepreneurship and markets: The dynamic role of embeddedness in networks in the creation of opportunities. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 523-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.009

Lattacher, W., Gregori, P., Holzmann, P., & Schwarz, E. J. (2021). Knowledge spillover in entrepreneurial emergence: A learning perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120660

Lederman, D., Messina, J., Pienknagura, S., & Rigolini, J. (2014). Latin American Entrepreneurs: many firms but little innovation. Washington, D.C., USA: The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0012-2

Leendertse, J., Schrijvers, M., & Stam, E. (2021). Measure Twice, Cut Once: Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Metrics. Research Policy, Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104336

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (1st ed.). London: Pinter Publishers.

Malerba, F., & McKelvey, M. (2020). Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics, 54(2), 503-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2

Malerba, F., & Pisano, G. P. (2019). Innovation, competition and sectoral evolution: an introduction to the special section on Industrial Dynamics. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(3), 503-510. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz017

Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented enterprises. Berlin: OECD Publishing.

Neill, S., Metcalf, L. E., & York, J. L. (2017). Distinguishing entrepreneurial approaches to opportunity perception. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(2), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2016-0162

Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis (1st ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

OECD. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. European Union: OECD Publishing.

Omri, A. (2020). Formal versus informal entrepreneurship in emerging economies: The roles of governance and the financial sector. Journal of Business Research, 108, 277-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.027

Ordeñana, X., Vera-Gilces, P., Zambrano-Vera, J., & Amaya, A. (2019). Does all entrepreneurship matter? The contribution of entrepreneurial activity to economic growth. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 33(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-11-2018-0256

Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2013). Entrepreneurial propensity of innovation systems: Theory, methodology and evidence. Research Policy, 42(5), 1015-1038.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.011

Roundy, P. T., Bradshaw, M., & Brockman, B. K. (2018). The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, 86, 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032

Salman, D. M. (2016). What is the role of public policies to robust international entrepreneurial activities on economic growth? Evidence from cross countries study. Future Business Journal, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2016.02.001

Schumpeter, J. A. (1949). Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History. In J. A. Schumpeter (Ed.), Change and the Entrepreneur: postulates and patterns of entrepreneurial history (pp. 63-84). Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J. A. (2011). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (1st ed.). New Jersey, USA: Transaction Publishers.

Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5

Sousa-Ginel, E., Franco-Leal, N., & Camelo-Ordaz, C. (2021). Knowledge conversion capability and networks as drivers of innovation in Academic Spin-Offs. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 59, 101615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101615

Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268

Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484

Stam, E., & Van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 809-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6

Sternberg, R., Bloh, J. von, & Coduras, A. (2019). A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 63(2-4), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2018-0014

Steruska, J., Simkova, N., & Pitner, T. (2019). Do science and technology parks improve technology transfer? Technology in Society, 59, 101127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.003

Szerb, L., Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., Ortega-Argilés, R., & Komlósi, É. (2014). REDI: The Regional Entrepreneurship and Development Index - Measuring regional entrepreneurship. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2776/79241

Szerb, L., Ortega‐Argilés, R., Ács, Z. J., & Komlósi, É. (2020). Optimizing entrepreneurial development processes for smart specialization in the European Union. Papers in Regional Science, 99(5), 1413-1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12536

Szerb, L., & Trumbull, W. N. (2018). Entrepreneurship development in Russia: is Russia a normal country? An empirical analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(6), 902-929. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2018-0033

Tavassoli, S., Obschonka, M., & Audretsch, D. B. (2021). Entrepreneurship in Cities. Research Policy, 50(7), 104255.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104255

Ha, N. T. T., & Hoa, L. B. (2018). Evaluating entrepreneurship performance in Vietnam through the global entrepreneurship development index approach. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 23(01), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946718500061.

Udimal, T. B., Luo, M., Liu, E., & Mensah, N. O. (2020). How has formal institutions influenced opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship? The case of brics economies. Heliyon, 6(9), e04931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04931

WEF. (2017). The global competitiveness report 2017-2018. Cologny, Suíça: The World Economic Forum.

Welter, C., & Alvarez, S. (2015). The state of opportunities: clarifying the transitions between opportunity types. Management Decision, 53(7), 1398-1411. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2014-0466

Wood, M. S., & Mckinley, W. (2017). After the Venture: The Reproduction and Destruction of Entrepreneurial Opportunity. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1238

Xie, K., Song, Y., Zhang, W., Hao, J., Liu, Z., & Chen, Y. (2018). Technological entrepreneurship in science parks: A case study of Wuhan Donghu High-Tech Zone. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 156-168.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.021

Zheng, S., & Du, R. (2020). How does urban agglomeration integration promote entrepreneurship in China? Evidence from regional human capital spillovers and market integration. Cities, 97, 102529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102529

Publicado

22-09-2022

Cómo citar

Avancci Dionisio, E., Silva, D., Quadros Carvalho, R., & Inácio Júnior, E. (2022). Evaluación de la validez del Global Entrepreneurship Index. REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal, 11(2), e2050. https://doi.org/10.14211/ibjesb.e2050

Número

Sección

Artículo de investigación (Teórico-empírico)