Micro and Small Business Innovative: Evidences in Companies From São Paulo
DOI:
10.14211/regepe.v7i3.729Keywords:
Innovation, Innovation Skills, Micro and Small BusinessAbstract
This article aims to understand the innovation skills in micro and small enterprises. A multiple case study was accomplished in six micro and small companies in São Paulo. The sources of evidence used were document analysis and semi-structured interviews with the managers responsible for the innovation actions in the organizations and the founder of the company, president or main partner. The interviews were recorded and the data analyzed using Atlas.Ti. The results showed that micro and small companies have a high potential for innovation and that innovation is an essential factor in achieving competitiveness. The innovation skills (leadership and strategy, innovative internal environment, people, innovation processes and results of the innovations) have been expressive to understand the innovation in these companies. However, these companies find it difficult to plan innovation activities, to obtain the necessary resources for innovation and to transform innovation factors into innovation results.Downloads
References
Bao, Y., Chen, X., & Zhou, K. Z. (2012). External learning, market dynamics, and radical innovation: Evidence from China's high-tech firms. Journal of Business Research, v. 65, pp. 1226-1233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.036
Baraldi, A., Vasconcellos, M. A., Di Serio, L. C., Pereira, S. M. S., & Prim, A. L. (2016). Competências da organização inovadora: um estudo em empresas do Instituto Paulista de Excelência da Gestão e da Fundação Nacional da Qualidade. Revista Alcance – Eletrônica, v. 23, n. 3, jul/set. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14210/alcance.v23n3(Jul-Set).p312-328
Barbieri, J. C. (2003). Organizações inovadoras: estudos e casos brasileiros. RJ: Editora da FGV.
Barbieri, J. C., & Álvares, A. C. T. (2002). Meio inovador empresarial: conceitos, modelos e casos. Revista IMES Administração, v. 56.
Barkhatov, V., Pletnev, D., & Campa, A. (2016). Key Success Factors and Barriers for Small Businesses: Comparative Analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 221, pp. 29-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.087
Börjesson, S., & Löfsten, H. (2012). Capabilities for innovation in small firms–a study of 131 high-tech firms and their relation to performance. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, v. 6(2), pp. 149-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2012.045634
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilema. Harvard Business School Press.
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of management studies, v. 47(6), pp. 1154-1191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family‐oriented particularistic behavior: implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, v. 52(2), pp. 344-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12102
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, v. 14(4), pp. 532-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Forsman, H. (2011). Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors. Research Policy, v. 40(5), pp. 739-750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.003
Forsman, H. (2009). Improving innovation capabilities of small enterprises: cluster strategy as a tool. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 13(02), pp. 221-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919609002273
Forsman, H., 2008. Business development success in SMEs. A case study approach. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. v. 15(3), pp. 606–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000810892382
Fórum de Inovação da Fundação Getúlio Vargas (2014). Modelo de diagnóstico da organização inovadora. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School: Boston.
Hall, J., Bachor, V., & Matos, S. (2014). The impact of stakeholder heterogeneity on risk perceptions in technological innovation. Technovation, v. 34(8), pp. 410-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.12.002
Heavey, C., & Simsek, Z. (2013). Top management compositional effects on corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating role of perceived technological uncertainty. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 30(5), pp. 837-855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12033
Mirzanti, I. R., Simatupang, T. M., & Larso, D. (2015). Mapping on Entrepreneurship Policy in Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 169, pp. 346-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.319
Parida, V., Oghazi, P., & Cedergren, S. (2016). A study of how ICT capabilities can influence dynamic capabilities. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, v. 29(2), pp. 179-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2012-0039
Pereira, M. F., Grapeggia, M., Emmendoerfer, M. L., & Três, D. L. (2009). Fatores de inovação para a sobrevivência das micro e pequenas empresas no Brasil. Revista de Administração e Inovação, v. 6(1), pp. 50-65.
Pinheiro, R. G., Romeiro, M. C., Faria, A. C., & Santos, I. C. (2014). A inovação em micro e pequenas empresas (MPE) do setor de serviços em São Caetano do Sul (SP). VIII Encontro de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas – EGEPE.
Quandt, C. O., Silva, H. D. F. N., Ferraresi, A. A., & Frega, J. R. (2014). Programas de gestão de ideias e inovação: as práticas das grandes empresas na região sul do Brasil. Revista de Administração e Inovação, v. 11, n. 3, pp. 176-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5773/rai.v11i3.1112
Ramos, A., & Zilber, S. N. (2015). O impacto do investimento na capacidade inovadora da empresa. Revista de Administração e Inovação, v. 12, n. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/rai.v12i1.100326
Schumpeter, J. (1982). A Teoria do Desenvolvimento Econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e o ciclo Econômico. Ed. Abril S.A. Cultural e Industrial: São Paulo.
Sebrae (org.) (2017). Anuário do trabalho nos pequenos negócios: 2015. 8.ed. Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas; Departamento Intersindical de Estatística e Estudos Socioeconômicos [responsável pela elaboração da pesquisa, dos textos, tabelas, gráficos e mapas]. Brasília, DF: DIEESE.
Sebrae (2015). Anuário do trabalho na micro e pequena empresa: 2014-2015. 6. ed. elaboração da pesquisa, dos textos, tabelas e gráficos. Brasília: DIEESE.
Silva, G., & Dacorso, A. L. R. (2014). Riscos e incertezas na decisão de inovar das micro e pequenas empresas. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 15(4), p. 229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712014/administracao.v15n4p229-255
Silva, G., & Dacorso, A. L. R. (2013) Inovação Aberta como uma Vantagem Competitiva para a Micro e Pequena Empresa. Revista de Administração e Inovação, v. 10, pp. 251-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5773/rai.v10i3.1036
Silva, G., Dacorso, A. L. R., Costa, V. B., & Serio, L. C. D. (2016). Relationships and Partnerships in Small Companies: Strengthening the Business through External Agents. Brazilian Administration Review, v. 13(1), pp. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692barnaahead0116
Tang, H. K. (1998). An Integrative model of innovation in Organizations. Technovation, v. 18, n. 5, pp. 297-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00009-1
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2008). Gestão da inovação. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Vasconcellos, M. A. (1997). Excelência e Humanização da Produção. Monografia para acesso ao nível de professor titular. SP: FGV-EAESP.
Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Downloads
Published
Métricas
Visualizações do artigo: 3859 PDF (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 1360
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
-
The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in the journal;
-
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas, and concepts expressed in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of their authors;
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the CC BY 4.0
License, which allows sharing the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; -
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work (Submitted version, Accepted version [Manuscript accepted by the author], or Published version [Record version]) online, for example in institutional repositories or preprints, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. REGEPE requires that authors indicate/link the published article with DOI. See the Effect of Open Access.
