Orientación empresarial individualizada: Desarrollo de escala centrado en el emprendimiento social
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v10i1.2008Palabras clave:
Orientación empresarial individual, El emprendimiento social, Escala.Resumen
Objetivo: Presentar la validación de contenido de una escala para evaluar y medir la Orientación Emprendedora Individual dirigida al emprendimiento social (IEO Social). Método: Apoyado en un enfoque integrador de las teorías que abordan lo afectivo y cognitivo en el comportamiento emprendedor, este estudio exploratorio sigue la metodología propuesta por Churchill (1979), DeVellis (2003) y Johnson y Morgan (2016). Resultados principales: 18 afirmaciones validaron la escala, distribuidas en tres dimensiones: proactividad social, innovación social y asunción de riesgos sociales. El estudio también propone la adopción de una cuarta dimensión del instrumento final: el cambio social, adaptado de Oceja y Salgado (2013), para dar cuenta de la medición del comportamiento prosocial de los emprendedores. Aportes teórico / metodológicos: La disponibilidad de un instrumento de medición construido teóricamente y sólidamente validado, específicamente para el emprendimiento social, contribuye a la calidad de la investigación empírica en el campo, ya que asegura los límites de los estudios, evitando la derivación de análisis para campos no deseados. Contribuciones sociales: La adecuada evaluación de la OEI Social tiene el potencial de contribuir a los programas de formación empresarial en la creación y desarrollo de mecanismos para despertar el interés y la intención de emprender en lo social. Relevancia / originalidad: Este estudio es inédito para comprender, en profundidad, las características emprendedoras individuales que componen el IEO Social; y, a partir de la delimitación de un concepto exclusivo, para construir y validar una escala teóricamente sólida y empíricamente confiable para medir el constructo.
CODIGO JEL: L31
Descargas
Citas
Ashoka, (2018). Unlonely Planet Impact Report: 2018 Global Study Finds Ashoka Fellows Change Policy, Market Dynamics, and How People Think. Retrieve from: https://www.ashoka.org/pt-br/story/2018-global-study-finds-ashoka-fellows-change-policy-market-dynamics-and-how-people-think. Acessed on March, 2019.
Austin, J. (2002). The collaboration challenge: how nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Barki, E., Izzo, D., Torres, H., & Aguiar, L. (Org.) (2013). Negócios com impacto social no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Petrópolis.
Barki, E., Comini, G., Cunliffe, A., Hart, S. L., & Rai, S. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social business: Retrospective and prospective research. RAE – Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(4), 380-384. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020150402
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing – insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache A-N, & Model, J. (2014). Harnessing Productive Tensions in Hybrid Organizations: the case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658-1685. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0903
Branzei, O. (2012). Social change agency under adversity: How relational processes (re)produce hope in hopeless settings. In K. Golden-Biddle & J. Dutton (Eds.), Using a positive lens to explore social change in organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 21–47). London: Routledge
Bolton, D. L., & Lane, M. D. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: development of a measurement instrument. Education + Training, 54(2-3), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211210314
Bornstein, D., & Davis, S. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: what everyone needs to know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Borzaga, C., Depedri, S., & Galera, G. (2012). Interpreting social enterprises. Revista de Administração, 47(3), 398-409. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1046
Cardon, M. S., Zietsma, C., Saparito, P., Matherne, B. P., & Davis, C. (2012). A tale of passion: new insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.002
Churchill, G. A. (1979), A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150876
Covin, J. G, & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 16(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
Dees, J. G. (2001). The meanings of ‘social entrepreneurship. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
DeGennaro, M. P., Wright, C. W., & Panza, N. R. (2016). Measuring Entrepreneurial Orientation in an assessment center: An individual level-of-analysis study. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 19(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000035
DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale Development: theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews,16, 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
Dorado, S. (2006). Social entrepreneurial ventures: different values so different process of creation. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1084946706000453
Dwivedi, A., & Weerawardena, J. (2018). Conceptualizing and operationalizing the social entrepreneurship construct. Journal of Business Research, 86, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.053
Elkington, J. & Hartigan, P. (2008). The power of unreasonable people. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Feather, N. T. (1992). Values, valences, expectations and actions. Journal of Science Issues, 48(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00887.x
Godói-de-Sousa, E. (2010). O processo sucessório em associações produtivas no Brasil: estrutura, desafios e oportunidades (Tese de doutorado). Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária (FEA), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Goktan, A. B., & Gupta, V. K. (2015). Sex, gender, and individual entrepreneurial orientation: evidence from four countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0278-z
Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S, Vogus, T., & Miller, T. L. (2013). Studying the Origins of Social Entrepreneurship: compassion and the Role of Embedded Agency. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 460-463. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0429
Haugh, H. M., Talwar, A. (2014). Linking social entrepreneurship and social change: The mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2449-4
Iizuka, E. S., Varela, C. A., & Larroudé, E. R. A. (2015). Social Business Dilemmas In Brazil: Rede Astacase. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(4), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020150403
IPEA - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. (2019). Mapa das Organizações da Sociedade Civil. Recuperado de https://mapaosc.ipea.gov.br/dados-indicadores.html
Johnson, R. L., & Morgan, G. B. (2016). Survey Scales: A Guide to Development, Analysis, and Reporting (1st ed.) New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kierkley, W. W. (2016). Entrepreneurial behaviour: the role of values. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-02-2015-0042
Kollmann, T., Christofor, J., & Kuckertz, A. (2007). Explaining Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation: Conceptualization of a Cross-Cultural Research Framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 4(3), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9818-6
Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., Meves, Y., & Kensbock, J. (2017). When members of entrepreneurial teams differ linking diversity in individual-level entrepreneurial orientation to team performance. Small Business Economics, 48(4), 843-859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9818-6
Kraus, S. et al. (2017). Social entrepreneurship orientation: development of a measurement scale. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research,1-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-07-2016-0206
Krueger, N. F. (2007). What lies beneath? The experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 31(1), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00166.x
Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Avolio, B. J. 2007. The impact of psychological capital interventions on performance outcomes. Working paper, Gallup Leadership Institute, University of Nebraska
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. 2004. Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33: 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.003
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28-39.
Miller, D. (1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science 29(7), 770-791. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2630968
Morris, M., & Schindhutte, M. (2005). Entrepreneurial values and the ethnic enterprises: an examination of six subculture. Journal of Small l Business Management, 43(4), 453-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2005.00147.x
Oceja, L., & Salgado, S. (2013). Why do we help? World change orientation as an antecedent of prosocial action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1925
Padilla-Meléndez, A., Fernández-Gámez, M. A., & Molina-Gómez, J. (2014). Feeling the risks: effects of the development of emotional competences with outdoor training on the entrepreneurial intent of university students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 861-884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0310-y
PIPE Social. (2019). Mapa de Negócios de Impacto Social + Ambiental. Recuperado de https://pipe.social/produtos/mapa2019
Popov, E. V., Veretennikova, A. Y., & Kozinskaya, K. M. (2018). Non-formal institutional environment of social entrepreneurship. Economic and Social Changes: Factos, Trends, Forecast, 11(4), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2018.4.58.14
Prahalad, C. K. (2005). Riqueza na Base da Pirâmide. Porto Alegre: Editora Bookman.
Podoynitsyna, K., Van der Bij, H., & Song, M. (2012). The Role of Mixed Emotions in the Risk Perception of Novice and Serial Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 36(1), 115-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00476.x
Qureshi, M. S. & Mahdi, F. (2014). Impact of effectuation based interventions on the intentions to start a business. Business Review, 9(2), 143-157.
Robinson, S. (2014). Elements of Entrepreneurial orientation and their relationship to entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 17(2), 1-12.
Robinson, P., & Huefner, J. (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice. Summer, 15(4), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101500405
Schumpeter, J. (1928). The instability of capitalism. The Economic Journal, 38(151), 361-386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224315
Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world (pp. 1-65). In Vinken, H. Soeter, J., & Ester, P. (Eds.), Comparing cultures, dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective. Leiden, The Netherlands.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002
Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship; the individual opportunity nexus. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Singer, P., & Souza, A. R. (2000). A economia solidária no Brasil: a autogestão como resposta ao desemprego. São Paulo: Contexto.
Theodossiou, G., Rigas, J., Goulas, Α., & Rigas, G. (2019). Solidarity economy, social and cooperative enterprises: the view of citizens in Greece. African Journal of Business Management, 13(2), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2018.8699
Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making effects of activation and selfcentrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 82(3), 434-447. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/62888
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building Social Business Models: Lessons from the Grameen Experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 308-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005
Zahra, S. A. (1993). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behaviour: a critique and extension. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 16(4), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879301700401
Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship – performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Márcia Maria Garçon, Vânia Maria Jorge Nassif
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista aceptan los siguientes términos:
1. El(los) autor(es) autoriza(n) la publicación del texto en la revista;
2. El(los) autor(es) garantiza(n) que la contribución es original e inédita y que no está siendo evaluada por otra(s) revista(s);
3. La revista no se responsabiliza por las opiniones, ideas y conceptos expresados en los textos, siendo de exclusiva responsabilidad de su(s) autor(es);
4. Los editores se reservan el derecho de realizar ajustes textuales y adecuarse a las normas de la publicación.
5. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y otorgan a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo bajo licencia simultánea (Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) lo que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
6. Se permite y anima a los autores a publicar su trabajo (versión enviada, versión aceptada [manuscrito aceptado por el autor] o versión publicada [versión del registro]) en línea, por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su sitio web, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como citas anteriores y mayores de trabajos publicados. La REGEPE pide como condiciones políticas para los Autores: Deben vincular al artículo publicado con DOI. Ver El efecto del acceso abierto en http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html.
