Proposal for a typology of self-employed considering the impact of the business and entrepreneurial engagement
DOI:
10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2549Keywords:
Self-employment, Entrepreneurial engagement, Impact of the Business, TypologyAbstract
Aim of the study: to propose a typology of self-employed, based on the dimensions of impact of the business and entrepreneurial engagement. Dilemma/problem or thesis: it is necessary to understand the different types of self-employed, since examining them as a single category could lead to limitations in the results of a study. Relevance/originality: as a criterion for defining the typologies, dichotomous categories were established to help with comparisons. The categories were: formalisation (formal or informal), innovation potential (with high innovation potential or low innovation potential), job creation (with an employee or without an employee), persistence in the activity as a TCP (intermittent or continuous), reconciliation of the activity with other professional/economic occupations (partial or full) and motivation (by opportunity or necessity). The dimensions adopted: impact of the enterprise and entrepreneurial engagement were considered to identify entrepreneurial activity and because they can be identified through actions. Four types of self-employed workers were proposed. Type 1 (innovator) has high impact and high engagement. Type 2 (explorer) has high impact and low engagement. Type 3 (conventional) has low impact and high engagement. Type 4 (occasional) has low impact and low engagement. Social contributions: the proposed typology is not about determining TCPs as being or not being entrepreneurs or assigning value judgements to the types, but about understanding their particularities and entrepreneurial activity, making it possible to choose and justify theories in the field of entrepreneurship and eventually direct appropriate actions and policies to each of the types.
Downloads
Translations of this article
References
Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00014-X
Block, J., Landgraf, A., & Semrau, T. (2019). The differential impact of societal cultural practices on part-time and full-time self-employment: A multi-level, multi-country study. International Small Business Journal, 37(1), 43-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618801441
Block, J. H., Fisch, C., & Hirschmann, M. (2022). The determinants of bootstrap financing in crises: evidence from entrepreneurial ventures in the COVID-19 pandemic. Small Business Economics, 58(2), 867-885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00445-6
Bögenhold, D. (2019). From hybrid entrepreneurs to entrepreneurial billionaires: Observations on the socioeconomic heterogeneity of self-employment. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(2), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218794231
Burke, A., & Cowling, M. (2020). On the critical role of freelancers in agile economies. Small Business Economics, 55(2), 393-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00240-y
Caliendo, M., Goethner, M., & Weißenberger, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial persistence beyond survival: Measurement and determinants. Journal of Small Business Management, v. 58(3), 617-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1666532
Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2008). The lag structure of the impact of business ownership on economic performance in OECD countries. Small Business Economics, 30, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9007-0
Clarivate, (2022). KeyWords Plus generation, creation, and changes. https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/KeyWords-Plus-generation-creation-and-changes?language=en_US
Colbari, A. L. (2015). Do autoemprego ao microempreendedorismo individual: desafios conceituais e empíricos. Revista Interdisciplinar de Gestão Social, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.9771/23172428rigs.v4i1.10909
Cornelissen, J. (2017). Editor’s comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0196
Cumming, D., Johan, S., & Zhang, M. (2013). The economic impact of entrepreneurship: Comparing international datasets. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(2), 162-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12058
De Vries, N., Liebregts, W., & Van Stel, A. (2020). Explaining entrepreneurial performance of solo self-employed from a motivational perspective. Small Business Economics, 55(2), 447-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00244-8
D’Amours, M., & Crespo, S. (2004). Les dimensions de l’hétérogénéité de la catégorie de travailleur indépendant sans employé: éléments pour une typologie. Relations Industrielles, 59(3), 459-489. https://doi.org/10.7202/010921ar
Fossen, F.M. (2021). Self-employment over the business cycle in the USA: a decomposition. Small Business Economics, 57(4), 1837-1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00375-3
Ganser-Stickler, G.M., Schulz, M., & Schwens, C. (2022). Sitting on the fence-Untangling the role of uncertainty in entrepreneurship and paid employment for hybrid entry. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(2), 106176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106176
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. GEM. (2023). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2023/2024 Global Report: 25 Years and Growing. London: GEM. Recuperado em 02 de abril de 2024, de: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/global-entrepreneurship-monitor-gem-20232024-global-report-25-years-and-growing
Gindling, T. H., Mossaad, N., & Newhouse, D. (2020). Self-employment earnings premiums/penalties and regulations: evidence from developing economies. Small Business Economics, 55(2), 507-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00248-4
Gonçalves, J., & Martins, P. S. (2021). Effects of self-employment on hospitalizations: instrumental variables analysis of social security data. Small Business Economics, 57(3), 1527-1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00360-w
Grilo, I., & Thurik, R. (2005). Entrepreneurial engagement levels in the European Union. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 3(2), 143-168. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/15798
Henríquez-Daza, M. C., Capelleras, J. L., & Osorio-Tinoco, F. (2019). Entrepreneurial Engagement and Growth Aspirations: The Moderating Role of Opportunity Perception. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 17(2). http://hdl.handle.net/2262/104715
Hessels, J., Rietveld, C. A., & Van Der Zwan, P. (2017). Self-employment and work-related stress: The mediating role of job control and job demand. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.007
Hessels, J., Grilo, I., Thurik, R., & Van Der Zwan, P. (2011). Entrepreneurial exit and entrepreneurial engagement. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21, 447-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0190-4
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. IBGE. (2023). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua: Notas Técnicas – Versão 1.12. Recuperado em 15 de abril de 2024, de: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101999_notas_tecnicas.pdf
Jones, S., & Nadin, S. (2024). “I’d like to make a proper go of it but it’s really scary”: the perpetual liminality of informally self-employed women as stigmatized entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2425945
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/256287
Kalenkoski, C. M., & Pabilonia, S. W. (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 on the self-employed. Small Business Economics, 58(2), 741-768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00522-4
Koch, M., Park, S., & Zahra, S. A. (2021). Career patterns in self-employment and career success. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(1), 105998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105998
Kwon, I., & Sohn, K. (2021). Trust or distrust: entrepreneurs vs. self-employed. Small Business Economics, 56(4), 1553-1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00278-y
La Porta, R., & Shleifer, A. (2014). Informality and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 109-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.109
Laguna, M., Razmus, W., & Zalinski, A. (2017). Dynamic relationships between personal resources and work engagement in entrepreneurs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 248-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12170
Laing, E., Van Stel, A., & Storey, D. J. (2022). Formal and informal entrepreneurship: a cross-country policy perspective. Small Business Economics, 10, 8-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00548-8
Lozares, C. (1990). La tipología en sociología, más allá de la simple taxonomía: conceptualización y cálculo. Revista de Sociologia, 139-163. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v34n0.1564
Magnan, E. S., Vazquez, A. C. S., Pacico, J. C., & Hutz, C. S. (2016). Normatização da versão brasileira da Escala Utrecht de engajamento no trabalho. Avaliação Psicológica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(2), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2016.1502.01
Martiarena, A. (2019). Re-examining the opportunity pull and necessity push debate: Contexts and abilities. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 32(7-8), 531-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1675776
Martinez, C., & Bryant, P. T. (2014). What keeps entrepreneurs entrepreneurial? A regulatory focus theory of entrepreneurial persistence. In: Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management, 14802. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.14802abstract
Martinez, C., & Bryant, P. T. (2017). The Psychological Origins of Entrepreneurial Life Path Engagement and Persistence. In: Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management, 11384. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.11384abstract
McKinney, J. C. (1968). Tipología constructiva y teoría social. Editora: Amorrortu.
McMullen, J. S., Bagby, D. R., Palich, L. E. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 875-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00260x
Morris, M. H., Neumeyer, X., & Kuratko, D. F. (2015). A portfolio perspective on entrepreneurship and economic development. Small Business Economics, 45, 713-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9678-5
Morris, M. H., Neumeyer, X., Jang, Y., Kuratko, D. F. (2018). Distinguishing types of entrepreneurial ventures: An identity‐based perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(3), 453-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12272
Nikolova, M., Nikolaev, B., & Boudreaux, C. (2023). Being your own boss and bossing others: The moderating effect of managing others on work meaning and autonomy for the self-employed and employees. Small Business Economics, 60(2), 463-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00597-z
Obschonka, M., Pavez, I., Kautonen, T., Kibler, E., Salmela-Aro, K., & Wincent, J. (2023). Job burnout and work engagement in entrepreneurs: How the psychological utility of entrepreneurship drives healthy engagement. Journal of Business Venturing, 38(2), 106272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106272
Patel, P.C., & Ganzach, Y. (2019). Returns to balance in cognitive skills for the self-employed: evidence from 18 countries. Small Business Economics, 52(1), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0018-4
Patel, P.C., & Wolfe, M.T. (2021). Under pressure: the effect of antioxidants on health consequences related to oxidative stress. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(1), 211-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720964184
Prandi, J.R. (1976). O Trabalhador por conta própria sob o Capital. São Paulo: Símbolo.
Ribas, R. P. (2020). Liquidity constraints, spillovers, and entrepreneurship: evidence from a cash transfer program. Small Business Economics, 55(4),1131-1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00178-1
Roldán, P. L. (1996). La construcción de tipologías: metodología de análisis. Revista de Sociologia, 9-29. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.1811
Sarkar, S., Rufín, C., & Haughton, J. (2018). Inequality and entrepreneurial thresholds. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(3), 278-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.009
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Skrzek-Lubasińska, M., & Szaban, J. M. (2019). Nomenclature and harmonised criteria for the self-employment categorisation. An approach pursuant to a systematic review of the literature. European Management Journal, 37(3), 376-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.11.001
Sorgner, A., Fritsch, M.; & Kritikos, A. (2017). Do entrepreneurs really earn less? Small Business Economics, 49(2), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9874-6
Swedberg, R. (2018). How to use Max Weber’s ideal type in sociological analysis. Journal of Classical Sociology, 18(3), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17743643
Szaban, J., & Skrzek-Lubasińska, M. (2018). Self-employment and entrepreneurship: A theoretical approach. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 26(2), 89-120. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.230
Uriarte, S., Mandakovic, V., & Amorós, J. E. (2024). Hybrid entrepreneurs: The value of experience. Journal of Small Business Management, 62(6), 2935-2964. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2023.2284911
van Praag, C. M., & Versloot, P. H. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 351-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9074-x
van Riel, R. (2021). Weberian ideal type construction as concept replacement. European Journal of Philosophy, 30(4), 1358-1377. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12752
Vladasel, T., Lindquist, M. J., Sol, J., Van Praag, M. (2021). On the origins of entrepreneurship: Evidence from sibling correlations. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(5), 106017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106017
Weber, M. (2008). Ensaios sobre a teoria das ciências sociais. Tradução de Rubens Eduardo Frias. 3ª edição – São Paulo.
Downloads
Published
Métricas
Visualizações do artigo: 95 PDF (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 19 Áudio (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 5 Vídeo (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 5 Pareceres (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 2
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jéssica Borges de Carvalho, Cândido Borges
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
-
The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in the journal;
-
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas, and concepts expressed in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of their authors;
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the CC BY 4.0
License, which allows sharing the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; -
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work (Submitted version, Accepted version [Manuscript accepted by the author], or Published version [Record version]) online, for example in institutional repositories or preprints, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. REGEPE requires that authors indicate/link the published article with DOI. See the Effect of Open Access.
Data statement
-
The research data is contained in the manuscript
