3 Mary: From women to women
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.e2012Keywords:
Social impact, Social enterprise, App for personal security, Incubator, MVPAbstract
Objective of the case: help students to evaluate the difficulties of the entrepreneurial process, observing the particularities that involve the conception of the business and its validation, the distance between the concept of the business and its effective operationalization and monetization. Methodology / approach: teaching case in Management, based on a real enterprise, started in a business incubator. Methodology / approach: teaching case in Management, based on a real enterprise, started in a business incubator. Main results: the case favors reflections about the methodologies adopted in the business model validation process, as well as the construction of your MVP. Theoretical / methodological contributions: develop in the student the ability to evaluate the business model validation process, from the interviews to the MVP. Relevance / originality: encourage critical discussion about building a startup's MVP. The case also provides a debate on the gap between the conception of the business model and its operationalization, including with regard to the financial sustainability of the proposed model. Social / management contributions: helping students to face the difficulties of the business model validation process when building an MVP, as well as developing a financial support model for a social impact enterprise.
JEL Code: M10, M13, M19, M31
Downloads
References
Baumann, F. (2013). Freeconomics: Do consumers tend to discriminate pay-models for information goods? Munich, Germany: Grin Publishing.
Bruton, G., Khavul, S., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2015). New Financial Alternatives in Seeding Entrepreneurship: Microfinance, Crowdfunding, and Peer–to–Peer Innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fetap.12143
Calic, G., & Mosakowski, E. (2016). Kicking Off Social Entrepreneurship: How A Sustainability Orientation Influences Crowdfunding Success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 738-767. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12201
Fundação Telefônica (2020). Programa Pense Grande. Recuperado de: https://pensegrande.org.br/
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2014). Princípios de Marketing (15ª. ed.). São Paulo: Pearson Universidades.
Malhotra, N. (2019). Pesquisa de Marketing – uma orientação aplicada (7ª. ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Maurya, A. (2018). Comece sua startup enxuta. São Paulo: Saraiva Educação.
McMullen, J. S, & Bergman Jr., B. J. (2018). Problems of Price Subsidization in Social Entrepreneurship. Business Horizon, 61(4), 609-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.009
Petrini, M., Scherer, P., & Back, L. (2016). Modelo de Negócios de Impacto Social. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 56(2), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020160207
Ries, E. (2019). A startup enxuta (1ª. ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Editora Sextante/GMT.
Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas – Sebrae (2012). Como Obter Financiamento para a sua Startup. Recuperado de: https://bibliotecas.sebrae.com.br/chronus/ARQUIVOS_CHRONUS/bds/bds.nsf/fd77181fa45b1e488d04a51c2d4fdcca/$File/5676.pdf
Shapiro, C.; Varian, H. R. (2003). A economia da informação: Como os princípios econômicos se aplicam à era da internet. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Tripathi, N., Oivo, M., Liukkunen, K., & Markkula, J. (2019). Startup ecosystem effect on minimum viable product development in software startups. Information and Software Technology, 114, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.06.008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Leticia Fantinato Menegon, Adrian Kemmer Cernev, José Eduardo Amato Balian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a (Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work (Submitted version, Accepted version [Author Accepted Manuscript], or Published version [Version of Record]) online, e.g., in any repository, Any website or Author’s homepage , as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. The REGEPE ask as policy conditions for the Authors to: Must link to published article with DOI. See the Effect of Open Access at: http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html