Misión emprendedora de las universidades en el abordaje de las Capacidades Dinámicas: Un estudio de casos múltiples en el sur de Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2164Palabras clave:
Oficias universitarias de transferencia de tecnología, Capacidades dinámicas, Misión empresarial de la universidadResumen
Objetivos del estudio: Para comprender cómo las universidades del sur de Brasil han desarrollado su misión empresarial, este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar el papel de las oficias de transferencia de tecnología através de la lente de la teoría de la capacidad dinámica. Metodología: se realizó un enfoque cualitativo y estrategia de estudio de caso múltiple que contiene 31 entrevistas semiestructuradas a diferentes actores vinculados a oficias de transferencia de tecnología , además de investigación documental. Principales resultados: El estudio reveló que prácticas de intuición, apropiación y transformación han sido adoptadas por las oficias de transferencia de tecnología en las universidades y las están apoyando para enfrentar un nuevo escenario en el que la educación superior está representada por demandas emprendedoras e innovadoras. Contribuciones teóricas: La contribución teórica radica en el debate sobre cómo las universidades en Brasil están gestionando estratégicamente sus prácticas para adaptarse a una nueva era en la educación através del desarrollo de capacidades dinámicas. Relevancia/Originalidad: Esta investigación ofrece un proceso de análisis en profundidad que incluyó los microfundamentos de las capacidades dinámicas y su importancia para el desarrollo y avance de la tercera misión de las universidades, contribuyendo para la originalidad del estudio. Aportes a la gestión: Los aportes a la gestión de este estudio son ofrecer una nueva visión de modelos y prácticas para que otras universidades, que han venido buscando operar en una dimensión empresarial, puedan beneficiarse.
Descargas
Citas
Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet, 395(10228), 931-934. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5
Abreu, M., Demirel, P., Grinevich, V., & Karataş-Özkan, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial practices in research-intensive and teaching-led universities. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 695–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9754-5
Baycan, T., & Arkali Olcay, G. (2021). Linking the Performance of Entrepreneurial Universities to Technoparks and University Characteristics in Turkey. Region, 8(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v8i1.300
Bellucci, A., & Pennacchio, L. (2016). University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 730–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9408-9
Bergmann, H., Geissler, M., Hundt, C., & Grave, B. (2018). The climate for entrepreneurship at higher education institutions. Research Policy, 47(4), 700–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2018.01.018
Bezanilla, M. J., García-Olalla, A., Paños-Castro, J., & Arruti, A. (2020). Developing the entrepreneurial university: Factors of influence. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030842
Brescia, F., Colombo, G., & Landoni, P. (2016) Organizational structures of Knowledge Transfer Offices: an analysis of the world???s top-ranked universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 41, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9384-5
Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, R., & Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2016). One size does not fit all! New perspectives on the university in the social knowledge economy. Science and Public Policy, 43(6), 731–735. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw018
Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284
Dalmarco, G., Hulsink W., & Blois, G. V. Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: Evidence from Brazil. Technological forecasting and social change, 135, 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.015
Denti, L., & Hemlin, S. (2012). Leadership and innovation in organizations: A systematic review of factors that mediate or moderate the relationship. International Journdalal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919612400075
Desidério, P. H. M., & Zilber, M. A. (2014). Barreiras no processo de transferência tecnológica entre agências de inovação e empresas: observações em universidades públicas e privadas. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 14(2), 99-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2014.v14i2.650
Dornbusch, F., & Neuhäusler, P. (2015). Composition of inventor teams and technological progress – The role of collaboration between academia and industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1360–1375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.003
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academic Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A. & Healey, P. (Eds.). (1998). Capitalizing Knowledge. New Intersections of Industry and Academia. New York, NY: State University of New Press, pp. 1-17.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations: Introduction. Industry and Higher Education, 12(4), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/095042229801200402
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. (T. & F. E-Library, Ed.). New York: Guedes.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Cantisano Terra, B. R. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313–330.
Fini, R., Rasmussen, E., Siegel, D. S., & Wiklund, J. (2018). Re-thinking the commercialization of public science: from entrepreneurial outcomes to societal impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives, 6(6), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0206
Gallardo, F. O., & Navarro, J. R. (2003). A model of strategic change: Universities and dynamic capabilities. Higher Education Policy, 16(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300016
Giuri, P. et al. 2019. The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.030
Grimaldi, D., & Fernandez, V. (2017). The alignment of University curricula with the building of a Smart City: A case study from Barcelona. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.011
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J. A., & Gajón, E. (2018). Determinants of Graduates’ Start-Ups Creation across a Multi-Campus Entrepreneurial University: The Case of Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(1), 150–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12366
Guerrero, M., Heaton, S., & Urbano, D. (2020). Building universities’ intrapreneurial capabilities in the digital era: The role and impacts of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Technovation, (April), 102139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102139
Guerrero, Maribel, Herrera, F., & Urbano, D. (2019). Strategic knowledge management within subsidised entrepreneurial university-industry partnerships. Management Decision, 57(12), 3280–3300. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2018-1126
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Gajón, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial university ecosystems and graduates’ career patterns: do entrepreneurship education programmes and university business incubators matter? Journal of Management Development, 39(5), 753–775. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-10-2019-0439
Hayter, C. S., & Cahoy, D. R. (2016). Toward a strategic view of higher education social responsibilities: A dynamic capabilities approach. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016680564
Heaton, S., Lewin, D., & Teece, D. (2019). Managing campus entrepreneurship: Dynamic capabilities and university leadership. Managerial and Decision Economics, (January), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3015
Laville, C., & Dionne, J. A. (1999). Construção do saber: Manual de Metodologia da Pesquisa em Ciências Humanas. Porto Alegre: ARTMED.
Leih, S., & Teece, D. (2016). Campus Leadership and the Entrepreneurial University: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0022
Lopes, D. P. T., Silva, S. A., Almeida, C. M., & Martins, L. G. R. (2021). Analisando um ecossistema de educação empreendedora a partir da experiência de uma instituição pública brasileira. Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas. https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2018
Machado, H. P. V., Sartori, R., & Crubellate, J. M. (2017). Institucionalização De Núcleos De Inovação Tecnológica Em Instituições De Ciência E Tecnologia Da Região Sul Do Brasil. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração (Porto Alegre), 23(3), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.177.67190
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A guide to design and Implementation (2a ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Arizona: Sage Publications.
Mora, J. G., Ferreira, C., Vidal, J., & Vieira, M. J. (2015). Higher education in Albania: developing third mission activities. Tertiary Education and Management, 21(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2014.994556
Moraes, G. H. S., Fischer, B. B., Campos, M. L., & Schaeffer, P. R. (2020). University Ecosystems and the Commitment of Faculty Members to Support Entrepreneurial Activity. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 17(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2020190013
O’Reilly, N. M., & Robbins, P. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and the entrepreneurial university: a perspective on the knowledge transfer capabilities of universities. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1490510
O’Reilly, N. M., Robbins, P. & Scanlan, J. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and the entrepreneurial university: a perspective on the knowledge transfer capabilities of universities, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 31:3, 243-263, https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1490510
Romero, E. C., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Fernandes, C. I. (2020). The multiple faces of the entrepreneurial university: a review of the prevailing theoretical approaches. Journal of Technology Transfer, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09815-4
Ruiz, S. M. de A., & Martens, C. D. P. (2019). Universidade Empreendedora: proposição de modelo teórico. Desenvolvimento Em Questão, 17(48), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2019.48.121-138
Secundo, G., Schiuma, G., & Jones, P. (2019). Strategic knowledge management models and tools for entrepreneurial universities. Management Decision, 57(12), 3217–3225. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2019-027
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640-660. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm036
Takahashi, A. R. W., Bulgacov, S., & Giacomini, M. M. (2017). Dynamic capabilities, operational capabilities (educational-marketing) and performance. Review of Business Management, 19(65), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v0i0.2831.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat. Manag. J. 28, 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J. (2012), Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 1395-1401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and Dynamic Capabilities. Long Range Plann. 51(1). 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.006
Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility. California Management Review, 58(4), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556.
Trencher, G., Bai, X., Evans, J., McCormick, K., & Yarime, M. (2014). University partnerships for co-designing and co-producing urban sustainability. Global Environmental Change, 28, 153–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.009
Woolf, N. H., & Silver, C. (2018). Qualitative analysis using NVivo. New York: Taylor & Francis.
World University Ranks. (2020). Retrieved July 14, 2020, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2020/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats
Yin, R. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press.
Yuan, C., Li, Y., Vlas, C. O., & Peng, M. W. (2018). Dynamic capabilities, subnational environment, and university technology transfer. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016667969
Zahra, S. A. (2000). The changing rules of global competitiveness in the 21st century. The Academy of Management Executive, 13(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb046384
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 917–955
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Vivien Mariane Massaneiro Kaniak, Rivanda Meira Teixeira, Adriana Roseli Wunsch Takahashi, Ananda Silva Singh
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista aceptan los siguientes términos:
1. El(los) autor(es) autoriza(n) la publicación del texto en la revista;
2. El(los) autor(es) garantiza(n) que la contribución es original e inédita y que no está siendo evaluada por otra(s) revista(s);
3. La revista no se responsabiliza por las opiniones, ideas y conceptos expresados en los textos, siendo de exclusiva responsabilidad de su(s) autor(es);
4. Los editores se reservan el derecho de realizar ajustes textuales y adecuarse a las normas de la publicación.
5. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y otorgan a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo bajo licencia simultánea (Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) lo que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
6. Se permite y anima a los autores a publicar su trabajo (versión enviada, versión aceptada [manuscrito aceptado por el autor] o versión publicada [versión del registro]) en línea, por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su sitio web, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como citas anteriores y mayores de trabajos publicados. La REGEPE pide como condiciones políticas para los Autores: Deben vincular al artículo publicado con DOI. Ver El efecto del acceso abierto en http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html.
